Removal or bivalving of a gauntlet, boot, or body cast — billable only when the removing provider did not apply the original cast.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $69.14
- Total RVUs
- 2.07
- Global, days
- 0
- Region
- Multi-region
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Identify the type of cast being removed or bivalved (gauntlet, boot, or body cast) by name
- State explicitly that the original cast was applied by a different provider or entity — this is the threshold criterion for billing 29700
- Document the clinical indication: swelling, skin breakdown, infection, cast malposition, patient presentation for routine removal, or other reason
- Note findings on skin and soft tissue inspection after cast removal or bivalving
- If bivalving, document that two longitudinal cuts were made and describe the clinical outcome (pressure relieved, cast retained as splint, etc.)
- If a new cast or splint was applied at the same encounter, document that separately to support the additional casting code
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
29700 covers the removal or bivalving (splitting into two halves) of a gauntlet, boot, or body cast. Bivalving involves two longitudinal cuts that convert a rigid cast into a clamshell, typically to relieve pressure from swelling, inspect the underlying skin, or manage a complication. Removal involves cutting and detaching the cast entirely.
The single most important billing rule for 29700: it is only payable when the entity removing or bivalving the cast is different from the entity that applied it. NCCI policy explicitly prohibits reporting 29700 when the same provider or practice group performed the original application — removal is considered included in that original service. If your practice applied the cast, this code does not generate separate reimbursement, regardless of how much time elapsed.
29700 carries a 000-day global period, so no post-service follow-up is bundled. It is a standalone, single-encounter code. If a new cast is applied at the same visit by the same provider, that application is coded separately under the appropriate casting code — the removal and the new application are distinct services. Document clearly that the original cast was applied by a different provider or facility, as that fact is the threshold criterion for billing this code at all.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 0.56 |
| Practice expense RVU | 1.42 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.09 |
| Total RVU | 2.07 |
| Medicare national rate | $69.14 |
| Global period | 0 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $69.14 |
HOPD (APC 5102) Hospital outpatient department | $285.75 |
ASC (PI P3) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $47.67 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 29700 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Same-entity rule violation: payer bundles 29700 when the applying and removing provider share the same group NPI or TIN
- Billed with a same-day casting code by the same provider, triggering NCCI bundling of the removal into the new application
- Reported during the global period of a fracture care or surgical code performed by the same provider — removal is included in that global package
- Missing documentation that the original cast was placed by a different entity, leaving no basis to override the bundling rule
- Incorrect cast type documented — note must match the specific cast category (gauntlet, boot, or body) covered by 29700 versus other removal codes
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 29700 if my practice applied the original cast two weeks ago?
02If I bivalve a cast and then reapply a new one at the same visit, can I bill both 29700 and a casting code?
03Can 29700 be billed during the global period of a fracture care code?
04Which modifier applies if the patient presents to our ED and we bivalve a cast the orthopedic surgeon's office applied?
05Does 29700 cover removal of a short arm cast or short leg cast?
06Is there a bilateral modifier consideration for 29700?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 03bedrockbilling.comhttps://bedrockbilling.com/static/cci/29700
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/29700
- 05podiatrym.comhttps://www.podiatrym.com/search3.cfm?id=15778
- 06CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the cast type removed or bivalved, the clinical reason (swelling, skin breakdown, routine removal, etc.), findings on skin inspection, and — critically — that the original cast was applied by a different provider or facility. That last detail is the billing threshold for 29700; without it in the note, the claim has no documented basis to survive a same-entity bundling challenge.
See how Mira captures CPT 29700 documentation