Application of a long leg cast (walker type) extending from the thigh to the foot, shaped at the base to allow weight-bearing ambulation via a cast shoe or rubber heel/footplate.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $154.65
- Total RVUs
- 4.63
- Global, days
- 0
- Region
- Knee
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Diagnosis driving immobilization — fracture site, deformity, or post-operative indication — with corresponding ICD-10 code
- Laterality explicitly documented (left, right, or bilateral) to support LT/RT modifier on the claim
- Cast type noted as 'walker' or 'ambulatory' with description of the weight-bearing mechanism (cast shoe, rubber heel, or footplate)
- Weight-bearing status and clinical rationale — document whether ambulation is permitted and why the walker-type cast was selected over a non-walking cast
- Extent of the cast — note that it extends from the thigh to the foot with toes free
- If modifier 22 is used, document the specific factors that made the application substantially more complex than typical (e.g., severe edema, deformity, uncooperative patient)
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 29355 covers the application of a long leg ambulatory cast — sometimes called a walking cast — that immobilizes the knee and leg from the thigh down to the foot while leaving the toes exposed. The base of the cast is formed to accept a cast shoe or fitted with a rubber heel and footplate, enabling the patient to bear weight and walk when clinically appropriate. This distinguishes 29355 from 29345, which is a non-walking long leg cast.
Primary indications include stabilization of femoral, tibial, or fibular fractures, post-reduction immobilization, and management of lower extremity deformities. The 000 global period means no bundled follow-up is included — each subsequent cast change or manipulation visit is separately billable. Because the code sits on the CMS therapy cap list (per the Medicare Claims Processing Manual), claims billed under a therapy provider type may be subject to financial limits and require appropriate modifiers.
Side-specific modifiers (LT/RT) are expected on virtually every claim. Bilateral application of long leg casts is unusual but would use modifier 50 on a professional claim. When cast application accompanies a separately identifiable E/M on the same date, append modifier 25 to the E/M — not to 29355 itself.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 1.49 |
| Practice expense RVU | 2.86 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.28 |
| Total RVU | 4.63 |
| Medicare national rate | $154.65 |
| Global period | 0 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $154.65 |
HOPD (APC 5102) Hospital outpatient department | $285.75 |
ASC (PI P3) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $96.00 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 29355 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing or mismatched laterality — claim lacks LT or RT modifier while diagnosis code specifies a side
- Bundling with a same-day fracture treatment code when the cast application is considered included in the fracture care procedure
- ICD-10 diagnosis does not support long leg immobilization (e.g., diagnosis limited to the ankle when a short leg cast would be appropriate)
- Billed under a therapy provider type without addressing therapy cap requirements or missing KX modifier when cap is exceeded
- Duplicate claim or missing modifier 76/77 when cast was reapplied the same day by the same or different provider
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 29355 and CPT 29345?
02Does CPT 29355 have a global period?
03Can 29355 be billed on the same day as a fracture treatment code?
04Is modifier 50 appropriate when both legs are casted?
05Why does 29355 appear on the Medicare therapy cap list?
06If the cast needs to be reapplied the same day due to cracking or patient movement during application, what modifier is used?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/clm104c05aug_op_therapy_9-3-3.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/29355
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/29355
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the cast type (walker versus non-walking), the weight-bearing mechanism applied (cast shoe, rubber heel, or footplate), explicit laterality, the extent of immobilization from thigh to foot with toes free, and the clinical indication driving the choice of long leg over short leg immobilization. Capturing these details at dictation prevents the two most common denial triggers: missing laterality and a diagnosis-to-procedure mismatch where the documented injury doesn't justify full long leg immobilization.
See how Mira captures CPT 29355 documentation