Application of a halo-type body cast — a rigid vest connected by bars to a halo ring fixed to the skull, used to immobilize the head and cervical spine.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $464.94
- Total RVUs
- 13.92
- Global, days
- 0
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Specify the indication: post-surgical cervical immobilization, traumatic instability, or deformity — generic 'spinal immobilization' is insufficient
- Document halo ring placement, number and location of skull pins, and vest fit, including whether sheepskin lining was used
- Record whether distal fixation to pelvis or femur was added, as this affects the construct documented
- Confirm that the cast application was either the sole service or performed following initial treatment by a different provider, justifying standalone billing
- Capture the ICD-10 diagnosis code that matches the clinical indication — cervical fracture, post-op cervical instability, or equivalent
- Note who applied the cast; if a cast technician employed by the facility applied it under physician supervision, document supervisory involvement per payer policy
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 29000 covers the application of a sheepskin-lined rigid vest that attaches via upright bars to a halo ring, which is secured to the skull with pins. The construct eliminates motion at the head-cervical spine junction and is used following major cervical spine surgery, traumatic cervical instability, or select high-level spinal deformity cases. Variants can extend fixation to the pelvis via a pelvic hoop or to the femur with pins when additional distal anchoring is required.
The code carries a 000-day global period, meaning no post-procedure care is bundled — each subsequent encounter, cast adjustment, or replacement is separately billable. Under CPT guidelines revised for 2022, cast application is included in the initial fracture or dislocation treatment code when the same provider performs both on the same day; 29000 is reported separately only when the cast is the sole service, when it follows initial treatment by a different provider, or when it represents a replacement cast during or after any global period.
Supplies (halo hardware, vest, bars, pins) are not included in the code valuation and should be reported separately using applicable HCPCS Level II supply codes. If a cast removal is performed by someone other than the provider who applied it, report the appropriate cast removal code (29700 series) separately.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 2.19 |
| Practice expense RVU | 10.81 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.92 |
| Total RVU | 13.92 |
| Medicare national rate | $464.94 |
| Global period | 0 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $464.94 |
HOPD (APC 5102) Hospital outpatient department | $285.75 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $153.62 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 29000 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Bundling denial when billed same-day as the primary spinal procedure by the same provider — cast application is included in the surgical code when both occur together
- Missing or mismatched diagnosis: payers reject claims when the ICD-10 code doesn't support cervical or high spinal immobilization requiring a halo construct
- Facility billing conflict when a hospital-employed cast technician performs application and both the facility and physician bill for the same service
- Lack of documentation distinguishing this as a replacement or subsequent cast versus the initial application bundled into the surgical procedure
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 29000 the same day as a cervical spine fusion?
02What global period applies to 29000?
03Are halo hardware and vest supplies included in 29000's reimbursement?
04Who can bill 29000 — the physician, the facility, or both?
05When is modifier 22 appropriate with 29000?
06Can 29000 be billed for a replacement halo cast after the original was damaged?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/29000
- 03ama-assn.orghttps://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/cpt-assistant-may2022-update-musculoskeletal.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 05asht.orghttps://asht.org/sites/asht/files/images/Practice/Casting%20and%20Strapping%20Guidelines.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the halo construct details from dictation — vest type, pin count, skull attachment sites, bar configuration, and any pelvic or femoral extension — along with the clinical indication and provider role in the application. That documentation prevents the two most common denials: bundling rejections that stem from an unclear relationship to a same-day surgical procedure, and medical necessity denials caused by a vague operative note that omits the specific immobilization rationale.
See how Mira captures CPT 29000 documentation