Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
High-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) delivered to the plantar fascia under ultrasound guidance, performed with regional or general anesthesia.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $303.95
- Total RVUs
- 9.1
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis with specific duration — most payers require failure of conservative care for at least 3–6 months
- Documentation of prior failed conservative treatments (physical therapy, orthotics, corticosteroid injections, stretching programs)
- Anesthesia type used (regional or general) and clinical justification for anesthesia beyond local
- Ultrasound guidance report confirming targeting of the plantar fascia insertion site
- Energy level delivered (joules/mm²), number of shocks, and frequency settings used during the session
- Laterality (left or right foot) clearly stated in the operative note and on the claim
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 28890 covers high-energy ESWT directed at the plantar fascia for chronic plantar fasciitis that has failed conservative treatment. The procedure requires anesthesia beyond local (regional or general) due to the intensity of the energy delivered — that anesthesia requirement is built into the code descriptor and distinguishes 28890 from low-energy ESWT alternatives. Ultrasound guidance is also included in the code; billing a separate ultrasound guidance code alongside 28890 is incorrect per NCCI policy on procedures that already bundle imaging.
The code carries a 90-day global period. Any E&M visit for a reason unrelated to plantar fasciitis during that window requires modifier 24. A significant, separately identifiable E&M on the day of the procedure — beyond the decision to perform it — requires modifier 25. The HOPD and ASC payment rates differ substantially (see the Site of Service comparison table), making site-of-service selection a meaningful revenue variable. Several commercial payers, including BCBS affiliates, continue to classify ESWT for plantar fasciitis as investigational, so prior authorization and medical necessity documentation are critical before scheduling.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 3.36 |
| Practice expense RVU | 5.45 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.29 |
| Total RVU | 9.1 |
| Medicare national rate | $303.95 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $303.95 |
HOPD (APC 5112) Hospital outpatient department | $1,642.82 |
ASC (PI P3) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $182.94 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28890 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Payer deems ESWT for plantar fasciitis investigational or non-covered — common with BCBS affiliates and some regional plans
- Insufficient documentation of failed conservative care prior to ESWT, triggering medical necessity denial
- Billing a separate ultrasound guidance code alongside 28890 — imaging is bundled into the descriptor and denied via NCCI
- Missing or incorrect laterality modifier (LT/RT) causing claim rejection or downcoding
- Prior authorization not obtained before the procedure, resulting in administrative denial regardless of medical necessity
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Is ultrasound guidance billable separately when performing 28890?
02Which modifier do I use if I perform ESWT on both feet in the same session?
03Does Medicare cover 28890?
04How does the 90-day global period affect follow-up billing?
05What is the difference between 28890 and 0101T for ESWT?
06Can I bill an E&M on the same day as 28890?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04bcbsms.comhttps://www.bcbsms.com/policy-search/medical/policy-detail/extracorporeal-shock-wave-treatment-for-plantar-fasciitis-and-other-musculoskeletal-conditions
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28890
- 06cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 07mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/28890
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the anesthesia type, energy settings (joules/mm², shock count, frequency), ultrasound guidance confirmation, laterality, and the treating diagnosis with duration of symptoms from the physician's dictation. It also flags documentation of prior failed conservative treatments. This prevents the two most common denial patterns: medical necessity rejections for inadequate conservative care history, and NCCI-triggered denials from separately billed ultrasound guidance that is already bundled into 28890.
See how Mira captures CPT 28890 documentation