Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Osteotomy of multiple metatarsals performed during a single operative session, typically to correct forefoot deformity, transfer metatarsalgia, or address pathologic alignment across more than one ray.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $835.69
- Total RVUs
- 25.02
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Identify each specific metatarsal on which osteotomy was performed (e.g., 2nd, 3rd, 4th ray) — vague references to 'multiple metatarsals' without enumeration flag audits
- State the type of osteotomy performed at each ray (Weil, dorsal closing wedge, oblique, etc.) — 'standard approach' language is an audit risk
- Document the preoperative diagnosis and clinical indication for each metatarsal addressed, including failure or inadequacy of conservative treatment
- Include intraoperative fluoroscopy findings if imaging guidance was used to verify osteotomy position, and note whether it is separately billable or integral to the procedure
- Record fixation method for each osteotomy site (K-wire, screw, no internal fixation) to support implant billing where applicable
- Note any concurrent procedures performed through separate incisions or on separate anatomical structures to support additional CPT codes with appropriate modifiers
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 28309 covers surgical cutting of multiple metatarsal bones in one operative setting. It is the appropriate code when the operative note documents osteotomy performed on more than one metatarsal — as opposed to 28308, which applies to a single metatarsal osteotomy. Common clinical scenarios include Weil osteotomies across multiple rays for metatarsalgia, corrective forefoot reconstruction following Charcot arthropathy, or realignment procedures for rheumatoid forefoot deformity.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op visits, wound checks, dressing changes, and cast management through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M services or procedures during that window require modifier 24 or 79, respectively. If a staged procedure on a different site is planned and performed within the global, use modifier 58. Bilateral forefoot osteotomies billed on the same day require modifier 50 on a single claim line for most Part B carriers; ASC settings require separate LT and RT lines.
ICD-10 diagnosis coding must support medical necessity — metatarsalgia (M77.4x), acquired deformity of toes (M20.5x), rheumatoid arthritis with foot involvement (M05.37x), and Charcot arthropathy (M14.67x) are common pairings. Payers, particularly commercial plans, may require documented failure of conservative management before authorizing this procedure.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 13.81 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.96 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.25 |
| Total RVU | 25.02 |
| Medicare national rate | $835.69 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $835.69 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28309 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding scrutiny: billing 28309 when the operative note documents only one metatarsal osteotomy — that maps to 28308, not 28309
- Missing or vague ICD-10 linkage — payers deny when the diagnosis code does not directly correspond to the metatarsal(s) documented as surgically treated
- Lack of documented conservative treatment failure prior to surgical authorization, particularly for commercial and Medicare Advantage plans
- Bundling conflicts when same-day lesser toe procedures (e.g., 28285, 28308) are billed without NCCI-compliant modifier or without documentation of distinct anatomical sites
- Bilateral procedure billing errors — submitting two units of 28309 instead of modifier 50 (Part B) or separate LT/RT lines (ASC) triggers claim-level rejection
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 28308 and 28309?
02Can I bill 28309 with lesser toe correction codes on the same day?
03How is bilateral 28309 billed correctly?
04What is the global period for 28309 and what does it include?
05Does intraoperative fluoroscopy bill separately with 28309?
06Which ICD-10 codes most commonly support 28309?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28309
- 05cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 06emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the number of metatarsals treated, osteotomy type at each ray, fixation method, and approach from dictation — locking in the specificity that separates a defensible 28309 from a downcoded 28308 or an unsupported claim. That prevents the most common denial pattern for this code: operative notes that reference multiple metatarsals in passing without naming each bone and technique.
See how Mira captures CPT 28309 documentation