Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Surgical osteotomy of the first metatarsal (shaft or base) excluding the metatarsophalangeal joint surface, performed to correct deformity, relieve pain, or address shortening — with or without bone graft.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $844.71
- Total RVUs
- 25.29
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Specify which metatarsal is involved and confirm it is not the articular surface being addressed
- Identify the surgical indication: angular deformity, shortening, structural malalignment, or pain with radiographic correlation
- Document whether autogenous bone graft was performed and the harvest site if applicable
- Confirm the procedure is not performed on the ipsilateral first toe or metatarsal concurrently with a bunionectomy (28291–28299)
- Record intraoperative fluoroscopy use if performed — note it is integral and not separately billable
- Document laterality (right vs. left foot) in both the operative report and the encounter header
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 28307 covers an osteotomy of the first metatarsal performed to correct angular deformity, shortening, or structural malalignment not addressed by the metatarsophalangeal joint articulation itself. The procedure may include autogenous bone graft when shortening requires structural augmentation. It sits in a 90-day global period, meaning all routine follow-up through day 90 is bundled — separate E/M visits in that window require modifier 24 for unrelated encounters.
The most critical billing boundary for 28307 is its hard exclusion from same-day bunionectomy codes (28291–28299) on the ipsilateral first toe or metatarsal. NCCI policy is explicit: bunionectomy codes that include first metatarsal osteotomy already capture what 28307 describes, making the combination a misuse of 28307. Reporting both will deny the column-two code without an allowable modifier pathway — no modifier overrides this edit. If the osteotomy is performed on a different metatarsal or at a separate anatomic site, document that distinction with specificity.
Site of service matters here. HOPD and ASC payments differ substantially (see the Site of Service comparison table). When the procedure is performed bilaterally — uncommon but possible in reconstructive cases — append RT and LT, not modifier 50, since bilateral foot procedures are typically reported on two lines with the appropriate laterality modifiers.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 6.34 |
| Practice expense RVU | 17.61 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.34 |
| Total RVU | 25.29 |
| Medicare national rate | $844.71 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $844.71 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28307 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- NCCI bundle denial when 28307 is reported same-day with bunionectomy codes 28291–28299 on the ipsilateral foot — no modifier bypasses this edit
- Missing or vague laterality documentation causing claim-level mismatch with RT/LT modifiers
- Insufficient operative note detail on deformity type or graft use, triggering medical necessity denial
- Upcoding flag when 28307 is billed for a procedure that falls within the descriptor of a comprehensive bunionectomy already performed
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 28307 alongside a bunionectomy on the same foot?
02Does 28307 include fluoroscopic guidance?
03What global period applies to 28307?
04How do I bill 28307 when the procedure is performed on both feet at the same encounter?
05Is bone graft separately reportable when performed with 28307?
06What ICD-10 diagnoses typically support 28307?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-medicaid-ncci-chapter-4-policy-manual.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 05cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific metatarsal operated on, the deformity type corrected, whether bone graft was harvested and from where, and explicit confirmation that no concurrent bunionectomy was performed on the ipsilateral first toe. That documentation prevents the most common 28307 denial: an NCCI bundling rejection when auditors cannot verify the procedure was anatomically distinct from a same-day bunionectomy.
See how Mira captures CPT 28307 documentation