Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Surgical correction of hallux valgus (bunion) using a double osteotomy technique, with bunionectomy and sesamoidectomy when performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,036.43
- Total RVUs
- 31.03
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Preoperative weight-bearing radiographs documenting the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA)
- Operative note identifying both osteotomy sites by location and method (e.g., proximal + distal, chevron + Akin)
- Explicit documentation of why double osteotomy was required — degree of deformity and inadequacy of a single-cut correction
- Notation of sesamoidectomy if performed, including which sesamoid and the clinical indication
- Laterality clearly documented (left foot, right foot, or bilateral) to support LT/RT/50 modifier use
- Conservative treatment failure documented prior to surgery (orthotics, shoe modification, injections) to support medical necessity
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 28299 covers hallux valgus correction performed via double osteotomy — meaning two bone cuts are made to realign the first ray. The procedure includes bunionectomy (removal of the bony prominence) and sesamoidectomy when indicated. It sits at the more technically demanding end of the bunion correction code family (28292–28299), used when a single osteotomy is insufficient to achieve adequate correction of the intermetatarsal angle and toe alignment.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op visits, wound checks, cast changes, and hardware monitoring through day 90 are bundled. Anything unrelated to the bunion correction billed during that window requires modifier 24 (E/M) or 79 (unrelated procedure). A same-day E/M is only separately billable with modifier 25 if a distinct, separately documented decision was made beyond the decision for surgery itself.
Payers occasionally challenge whether a double osteotomy was truly necessary versus a single distal or proximal cut (28296 or 28298). Operative notes must document the rationale for two osteotomies — specifically the degree of deformity, intermetatarsal angle, and why a single osteotomy would not achieve adequate correction. Without that justification, expect downcoding to 28296.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 9.06 |
| Practice expense RVU | 20.84 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.13 |
| Total RVU | 31.03 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,036.43 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,036.43 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,751.04 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28299 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Downcoded to 28296 or 28298 when operative note fails to justify why two osteotomies were required over one
- Missing or insufficient preoperative imaging to document severity of deformity and support double osteotomy selection
- Laterality modifier absent, causing claim to reject or pend for clarification
- Global period violation — routine post-op services billed separately without appropriate modifier (24, 78, or 79)
- Medical necessity denial when conservative treatment failure is not documented in the pre-surgical record
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What separates 28299 from 28296 and 28298?
02Is sesamoidectomy always included in 28299?
03Can 28299 be billed bilaterally?
04What modifiers apply if the patient returns to the OR during the 90-day global?
05Does a same-day E/M require a modifier when 28299 is also billed?
06What ICD-10 codes support medical necessity for 28299?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/28299
- 03payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/28299-CPT-fee-schedule
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/28299
- 05findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/28299-cpt-code.html
- 06cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific osteotomy techniques performed (e.g., proximal metatarsal + distal Akin), the degree of deformity documented on preoperative imaging, the clinical rationale for a double versus single osteotomy, sesamoidectomy performance and indication, and laterality. This directly prevents the most common denial pattern for 28299 — downcoding to 28296 because the operative note didn't justify two cuts.
See how Mira captures CPT 28299 documentation