Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Capsulotomy of a major joint of the foot with extensive release of multiple contractures, performed as a revision or complex corrective procedure.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,480.33
- Total RVUs
- 44.32
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must identify the specific joint(s) released by name, not 'standard approach' or generic language
- Document prior treatment history — surgical or conservative — establishing medical necessity for revision-level release
- Describe each structure released (capsule, ligaments, tendons) and the anatomic extent of the release performed
- Record intraoperative findings that distinguish this from a primary or limited capsulotomy, including deformity type and severity
- Include pre- and post-operative weight-bearing or fluoroscopic imaging findings that support the diagnosis and planned correction
- Note laterality explicitly — left, right, or bilateral — in both the preoperative diagnosis and the operative report
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 28262 describes an extensive capsular release involving a major joint of the foot, typically performed to correct severe or recurrent deformity — most commonly rigid flatfoot or equinovarus contractures — where prior conservative treatment or surgery has failed. The procedure involves opening the joint capsule and releasing multiple contracted soft-tissue structures to restore alignment and mobility. It is a substantially more involved undertaking than a simple capsulotomy, and operative documentation must reflect the extent of release performed.
The 90-day global period means all routine follow-up visits, wound checks, and cast or splint changes through day 90 are bundled into payment. Any E/M service for a new or unrelated condition in that window requires modifier 24. If a staged or related procedure is performed after the initial surgery within the global period, modifier 78 applies for a return to the OR for a complication; modifier 79 covers an unrelated procedure in the same window.
Bilateral cases — rare but possible — require modifier 50 or laterality modifiers LT/RT on separate claim lines depending on payer rules. Modifier 22 is supportable when operative complexity significantly exceeds typical cases, but the operative note must explicitly describe what made the case extraordinary. Payers vary on whether modifier 22 triggers manual review versus automatic payment; expect pre-payment scrutiny.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 16.78 |
| Practice expense RVU | 24.34 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.2 |
| Total RVU | 44.32 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,480.33 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,480.33 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,682.29 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 28262 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note lacks specificity on structures released, triggering downcoding to a less complex capsulotomy code
- Medical necessity not established — no documentation of failed prior treatment or prior surgical history
- Modifier 22 claimed without operative note language quantifying the additional work or time beyond typical
- Bundling conflict when concomitant tendon or osteotomy codes are billed without appropriate modifier to establish separate and distinct service
- Laterality missing or conflicting between claim and operative report, causing payer rejection
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes 28262 from a simpler foot capsulotomy code?
02Can 28262 be billed with osteotomy or tendon transfer codes on the same day?
03How does the 90-day global period affect post-op billing for 28262?
04Is modifier 22 defensible for an unusually complex 28262 case?
05What NCCI bundling issues come up most often with 28262?
06How should bilateral cases be billed?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-procedure-procedure-ptp-edits
- 03cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-ncci-medicaid-policy-manual.pdf
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/clm104c23.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures joint name, structures released, laterality, intraoperative deformity findings, and prior surgical history directly from dictation for 28262. That documentation chain prevents downcoding audits that target operative notes lacking explicit release inventory and revision context.
See how Mira captures CPT 28262 documentation