Closed treatment of a weight-bearing articular fracture of the distal tibia (pilon or tibial plafond fracture), without manipulation, with or without anesthesia.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $356.72
- Total RVUs
- 10.68
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Imaging (X-ray or CT) confirming fracture of the weight-bearing articular surface of the distal tibia (pilon/tibial plafond)
- Explicit statement that no open surgical approach and no manipulation of fracture fragments was performed
- Neurovascular status of the extremity documented pre- and post-treatment
- Fracture classification or description of articular comminution pattern to support medical necessity
- Immobilization or casting method applied and patient weight-bearing status instructions
- Clinical rationale for closed non-manipulative management (e.g., non-displaced, patient comorbidities)
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 27824 covers closed, non-manipulative treatment of a pilon or tibial plafond fracture — the weight-bearing articular surface of the distal tibia. No incision is made and no reduction of fracture fragments is performed. The procedure may be carried out with or without anesthesia. This is the least invasive option in the pilon fracture coding family; when manipulation is added, 27825 applies, and open treatment escalates to 27826–27828 depending on fibular involvement.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op fracture management — cast changes, follow-up imaging reads reported under the global, and standard office visits — is bundled from the date of service through day 90. New problems or unrelated visits in that window require modifier 24. A decision-for-surgery visit on the same day requires modifier 57 if it was an E/M at the major-surgery threshold.
Pilon fractures frequently involve associated soft-tissue injury, compartment syndrome risk, and staged treatment plans. If a separately identifiable procedure is performed at the same encounter — for example, fasciotomy or fibula fixation — use modifier 59 or the appropriate XS modifier to distinguish distinct services, provided NCCI edits permit unbundling. Document the fracture pattern, articular involvement, neurovascular status, and treatment rationale clearly; vague operative notes are the primary audit trigger for this code family.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 3.23 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.8 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.65 |
| Total RVU | 10.68 |
| Medicare national rate | $356.72 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $356.72 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $135.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27824 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Code selected does not match treatment rendered — manipulation performed but 27824 (no manipulation) billed instead of 27825
- Insufficient documentation of articular involvement; generic 'distal tibia fracture' language without specifying pilon or tibial plafond
- Routine post-op follow-up visits billed separately during the 90-day global period without modifier 24
- Imaging not documented in the record or not linked to the treating encounter
- Bilateral modifier applied without documentation of bilateral pilon fractures — extremely rare and will trigger review
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes 27824 from 27825?
02Can I bill for the cast or splint application separately?
03Is fluoroscopy separately billable with 27824?
04What modifier do I use for a related complication requiring return to the OR within the 90-day global?
05Does 27824 require a specific ICD-10 code pairing?
06Can 27824 and a fibula fracture code be billed together on the same day?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2024/code/27824/info
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r12052cp.pdf
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27824
- 06findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/27824-cpt-code.html
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture site (distal tibia, articular surface), confirms the closed non-manipulative approach in the operative note, records anesthesia use, and documents neurovascular exam findings and immobilization method. This prevents the most common audit flag: operative notes that describe a pilon fracture without explicitly stating no manipulation was performed, which reviewers use to challenge whether 27824 or 27825 was the correct code.
See how Mira captures CPT 27824 documentation