Tibial shaft fracture treated by intramedullary nail insertion, with or without interlocking screws and/or cerclage wire, regardless of concurrent fibular fracture.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $918.19
- Total RVUs
- 27.49
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Fracture classification and location within tibial shaft (proximal, mid, distal third)
- Operative note explicitly identifies IM nail insertion, reaming technique, and any interlocking screws or cerclage applied
- If fibular fracture is present, document that it was not treated separately and explain why 27759 encompasses it
- Laterality documented (left vs. right tibia) to support LT or RT modifier
- Fluoroscopy or imaging guidance usage documented if separately billable
- Anesthesia type and ASA classification noted for facility billing alignment
- Post-op alignment and implant position confirmed via intraoperative imaging, referenced in the note
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27759 covers intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture — the surgeon makes a proximal incision near the knee, reams the medullary canal, drives a rod through the full length of the tibia, and locks it with interlocking screws proximally and distally. Cerclage wiring may also be applied. The code explicitly encompasses concurrent fibular fractures: if a fibular fracture is present and treated as part of the same operative episode, you do not separately bill fibular fracture codes such as 27784. The 'with or without fibular fracture' language in the code descriptor swallows any associated fibula treatment performed through the same approach or separately.
The 90-day global period governs all post-op care. That window covers fracture checks, cast changes, wound care, and routine hardware monitoring through day 90. Unrelated conditions or new injuries billed during that window require modifier 24 (E/M) or 79 (unrelated procedure). A staged revision or unplanned return to the OR for the same fracture site uses modifier 78. Per AMA CPT Assistant guidance, intramedullary nailing is classified as open treatment regardless of whether the fracture site itself is directly visualized — because the fixation device is placed through a remote surgical exposure.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 14.09 |
| Practice expense RVU | 10.43 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.97 |
| Total RVU | 27.49 |
| Medicare national rate | $918.19 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $918.19 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $8,846.34 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27759 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Separate billing of fibular fracture code 27784 alongside 27759 — the fibula is bundled into 27759's descriptor
- Missing or incorrect laterality modifier (LT/RT) causing claim rejection on payers that mandate laterality for unilateral limb procedures
- Post-op services billed without modifier 24 or 79 during the 90-day global period
- Upcoding or downcoding due to confusion between 27759 (IM nail) and 27758 (open plate/screw fixation) — the implant type drives code selection
- Facility site-of-service mismatch when procedure shifts from planned HOPD to ASC without updating the place-of-service code
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01Can I separately bill for fibular fracture treatment when 27759 is the primary code?
02What modifier do I use if the patient returns to the OR for hardware failure during the 90-day global?
03What distinguishes 27759 from 27758?
04Is 27759 considered open treatment even if the fracture site isn't directly visualized?
05Do I need laterality modifiers on 27759?
06Can 27759 be billed with an E/M on the same day?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27759
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/coding-newsletters/my-orthopedic-coding-alert/reader-questions-1-code-reports-tib-and-fib-treatment-article
- 03ama-assn.orghttps://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/cpt-assistant-may2022-update-musculoskeletal.pdf
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/27759
- 05CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the nail brand and size, reaming sequence, interlocking screw count and configuration, cerclage application, fluoroscopic confirmation steps, and the status of any concurrent fibular fracture from the surgeon's dictation. That detail prevents the two most common audit flags for 27759: operative notes that omit implant specifics and notes that fail to address a co-documented fibular fracture — both of which invite separate fibula code scrutiny and medical necessity challenges.
See how Mira captures CPT 27759 documentation