Multiple osteotomies of the tibia and/or fibula with bone realignment stabilized on an intramedullary rod — the Sofield-type procedure for severe angular or rotational deformity correction.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,016.72
- Total RVUs
- 30.44
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Diagnosis establishing the underlying deformity (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta, metabolic bone disease, post-traumatic malalignment) with ICD-10 code
- Operative note naming the specific bone(s) cut — tibia, fibula, or both — and the number and levels of osteotomies performed
- Description of the intramedullary rod used, including type, size, and method of fixation at each realigned segment
- Imaging (preoperative X-rays or CT) documenting the angular or rotational deformity requiring multi-level correction
- Surgeon's narrative explaining why multiple osteotomies were necessary rather than a single corrective cut
- Intraoperative fluoroscopy records confirming alignment on the rod before wound closure
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 27712 covers a Sofield-type procedure: multiple osteotomies through the tibia (and often the fibula) with realignment of bony segments on an intramedullary rod. This is not a routine corrective osteotomy — it is reserved for patients with severe, multi-level deformity such as osteogenesis imperfecta, severe metabolic bone disease, or post-infectious or post-traumatic segmental malalignment that cannot be corrected with a single-level cut. The procedure requires internal fixation across all realigned segments, and documentation must reflect the number of osteotomy levels and the rationale for an intramedullary construct over a single-cut approach.
The 90-day global period applies. All routine post-operative visits, wound care, and implant-related follow-up through day 90 are bundled. If a distinct, unrelated procedure is performed during that window, bill with modifier 79. A return to the OR for a complication directly related to the index procedure uses modifier 78. An E&M for a new problem unrelated to the leg osteotomy during the global period requires modifier 24.
This code is on the CMS inpatient-only list for OPPS purposes — it cannot be billed in a hospital outpatient setting or ASC under Medicare. Verify prior authorization and site-of-service requirements with commercial payers before scheduling, as payment rules vary.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 15.47 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.68 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.29 |
| Total RVU | 30.44 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,016.72 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,016.72 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $9,493.97 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27712 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note describes only a single osteotomy level, not matching the 'multiple' requirement of 27712
- Billed in a hospital outpatient or ASC setting under Medicare — 27712 is on the inpatient-only list
- Missing pre-operative imaging documentation to support medical necessity of multi-level deformity correction
- Upcoded from 27705 or 27707 without adequate documentation of intramedullary rod fixation
- Global period violation — routine post-op visits billed without modifier 24, 25, or 79 as appropriate
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Can 27712 be performed in an ASC for Medicare patients?
02What distinguishes 27712 from a single tibial osteotomy code like 27705?
03If the fibula also required osteotomies, is that separately billable?
04How do you handle a return to the OR during the 90-day global for hardware failure?
05Is modifier 22 supportable for 27712, and what documentation is needed?
06Can 27712 be billed bilaterally on the same day?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r13573cp.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r11150cp.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 05novitas-solutions.comhttps://www.novitas-solutions.com/webcenter/portal/MedicareJL/pagebyid?contentId=00003604
- 06aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/blog/28071-understand-modifier-59-and-ncci-bundling/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the number of osteotomy levels, the bones involved (tibia, fibula, or both), rod type and size, and the clinical rationale for multi-level versus single-level correction directly from surgeon dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag for 27712: an operative note that documents only one cut, triggering a downcode to 27705 or a denial for insufficient medical necessity.
See how Mira captures CPT 27712 documentation