Soft tissue repair · Foot & ankle
Primary end-to-end repair of both the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) of the ankle in a single operative session.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $510.37
- Total RVUs
- 15.28
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Foot & ankle
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Specify both ligaments repaired by name: ATFL and CFL — do not just document 'lateral ankle ligament repair'.
- Document the repair technique explicitly as end-to-end (direct) suture approximation to support primary repair code selection over 27698.
- If Gould modification is performed, note that retinaculum advancement was used to reinforce the primary repair — do not bill it separately.
- Record pre-op diagnosis of lateral ankle instability with mechanism of injury (e.g., recurrent inversion sprains, acute ligamentous disruption).
- Document intraoperative findings for both the ATFL and CFL, including ligament quality, degree of disruption, and tissue used for repair.
- Note laterality (left vs. right) to support modifier LT or RT on the claim.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
27696 covers a primary repair of both ankle collateral ligaments — the ATFL and CFL — where each ligament is sutured end-to-end. The classic Brostrom procedure is the prototype: disrupted ligament ends are directly approximated and sutured, restoring the lateral stabilizers of the ankle. If the surgeon reinforces the repair by advancing the extensor retinaculum over it (the Gould modification), that work is bundled into 27696 and not separately reportable. Per AAOS, retinaculum transfer or mobilization is included in the global service.
Code selection turns on technique, not timing. The distinction between primary (27695/27696) and secondary (27698) repair is not about whether the injury is acute or chronic — it is about whether the native ligament ends are sutured directly together. A reconstruction that reroutes the peroneus brevis tendon (Evans, Chrisman-Snook, Watson-Jones) is a secondary repair reported with 27698. If only one collateral ligament is repaired end-to-end, use 27695 instead. Both ligaments must be repaired for 27696 to apply.
27696 carries a 90-day global period. All routine post-op office visits, dressing changes, and suture removals through day 90 are included. Unrelated E/M services during the global require modifier 24; a significant separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery requires modifier 25. Casting and splinting applied at the time of surgery are bundled under NCCI rules and are not separately billable for the same anatomic area.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 8.37 |
| Practice expense RVU | 5.79 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.12 |
| Total RVU | 15.28 |
| Medicare national rate | $510.37 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $510.37 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $5,352.64 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27696 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Code selected as 27696 when operative note describes only one ligament repaired — 27695 is the correct code in that scenario.
- Downcoded to 27695 or denied when documentation says 'standard lateral ankle repair' without naming both the ATFL and CFL as individually repaired.
- Claim denied or bundled when Gould modification is billed separately instead of being treated as integral to the primary repair.
- Payer reclassifies to 27698 (secondary repair) when the surgeon's note mentions chronic instability — primary vs. secondary is technique-based, not timing-based; lack of explicit end-to-end suture language invites this error.
- Casting or strapping billed same-day for the operative ankle triggers NCCI edit denial — post-op immobilization is bundled under the musculoskeletal global service rules.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 27695, 27696, and 27698?
02Can I bill 27696 when the injury is chronic, not acute?
03Is the Gould modification separately billable on top of 27696?
04Should I use modifier 59 if I repair the ankle ligaments at the same session as another foot-ankle procedure?
05What happens if post-op casting is billed on the same date as 27696?
06What modifier is required for an E/M visit during the 90-day global period for an unrelated problem?
07Does 27696 require both the ATFL and CFL to be repaired to use the code?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01beckersasc.comhttps://www.beckersasc.com/asc-coding-billing-and-collections/surgery-center-coding-guidance-ankle-collateral-ligament-repair/
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/blog/23953-stabilize-wobbly-lateral-ankle-coding/
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-policy-manual
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 05CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific ligaments operated on (ATFL, CFL, or both), the repair technique (end-to-end suture vs. tendon transfer), and any retinaculum augmentation from the surgeon's dictation. That distinction between 27695, 27696, and 27698 lives entirely in operative language — vague documentation is the single most common reason these claims are downcoded or reclassified on audit.
See how Mira captures CPT 27696 documentation