Open treatment of a distal femoral epiphyseal (growth plate) separation, including internal fixation when performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $810.97
- Total RVUs
- 24.28
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Knee
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Patient age and skeletal maturity — growth plate injury diagnosis requires a skeletally immature patient and reviewers will flag adults
- Operative note must name the approach used (e.g., medial parapatellar, lateral), not just 'standard approach'
- Explicit documentation of open reduction — percutaneous fixation of a distal femoral epiphyseal separation is coded separately (27509)
- Hardware type, size, and placement relative to the physis documented in the operative note
- Imaging (intraoperative fluoroscopy or X-ray) findings confirming reduction and fixation, with notation of whether fluoroscopy guidance was integral to the procedure or a separately billable service
- Fracture classification (Salter-Harris type) recorded — supports medical necessity and ICD-10 specificity
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 27519 covers open reduction of a distal femoral epiphyseal separation — a fracture at the growth plate of the lower femur — with internal fixation performed as needed. This injury pattern occurs almost exclusively in skeletally immature patients; the physis is the mechanical weak point that fails before the ligaments do. Because the growth plate is involved, operative technique must account for hardware placement relative to the physis to minimize the risk of iatrogenic growth arrest.
The 090-day global period starts on the date of surgery. Preoperative evaluation on the day before surgery, the surgical encounter itself, and all routine postoperative visits through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24. A same-day decision-for-surgery E/M needs modifier 57 if the service drove the operative decision.
Bilaterally, this injury is exceedingly rare, but if treated simultaneously use modifiers LT and RT on separate claim lines for ASC reporting. Confirm NCCI edits before billing any associated fluoroscopy or imaging guidance code — if intraoperative fluoroscopy is documented as integral to the fixation, it is not separately reportable.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 12.92 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.61 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.75 |
| Total RVU | 24.28 |
| Medicare national rate | $810.97 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $810.97 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,682.29 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27519 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- ICD-10 code mismatch — using an adult distal femur fracture code instead of a physeal/epiphyseal separation code (S79.1xx series)
- Unbundling of intraoperative fluoroscopy when payer treats it as integral to 27519 and not separately payable
- Global period violations — routine post-op visits billed without modifier 24 or 79 within the 90-day window
- Medical necessity denial when documentation lacks evidence of failed or inappropriate non-operative management, or when injury severity doesn't support open reduction over closed or percutaneous approaches
- Wrong code selected — 27509 (percutaneous fixation) used when operative note clearly describes open exposure and direct reduction
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01How does 27519 differ from 27509?
02Can I bill separately for intraoperative fluoroscopy with 27519?
03What ICD-10 codes support 27519?
04What modifier applies if I perform an unrelated procedure during the 90-day global?
05Is modifier 22 ever appropriate for 27519?
06Does the 90-day global include postoperative casting or splinting changes?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03abos.orghttps://www.abos.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/sports-cpt-updated.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27519
- 05findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/27519-cpt-code.html
- 06payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/27519-CPT-fee-schedule
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the Salter-Harris classification, the specific open approach used, hardware type and physis-relative placement, intraoperative fluoroscopy use (integral vs. additional), and the patient's skeletal maturity from surgeon dictation. That detail set prevents the two most common 27519 denials: ICD-10 mismatch due to missing fracture specificity and fluoroscopy unbundling flags.
See how Mira captures CPT 27519 documentation