Percutaneous tenotomy of multiple adductor or hamstring tendons in the thigh region
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $376.09
- Total RVUs
- 11.26
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Knee
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Specify which tendons were released (adductor longus, brevis, magnus, gracilis, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris) — not just 'multiple tendons'
- Confirm percutaneous approach is documented; open approach would require a different code
- Document the clinical indication (e.g., spastic adductor contracture, hamstring contracture, neurologic diagnosis driving the procedure)
- Record that more than one tendon was divided during the same operative session to distinguish from 27306
- Note any intraoperative imaging guidance used and whether it was separately reportable or integral to the procedure
- If modifier 22 is appended, document quantifiable reasons for increased complexity — procedure time, unusual patient anatomy, or severity of contracture
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27307 describes a percutaneous tenotomy performed on multiple adductor or hamstring tendons. Unlike the open fasciotomy reported with 27305 or the single-tendon percutaneous tenotomy reported with 27306, this code requires that the surgeon cut through skin and release more than one tendon percutaneously during the same operative session. The 90-day global period applies, meaning routine follow-up through day 90 is bundled into the surgical payment.
Adductor tenotomy is performed most often in patients with spastic hip conditions, cerebral palsy, or severe adductor contracture. Hamstring tenotomy is similarly indicated in flexion contracture settings. When the clinical picture demands releasing multiple tendons rather than one, 27307 is the correct code — billing 27306 twice for the same encounter is unbundling and will trigger NCCI edits. If the procedure is more involved than typical (e.g., unusually severe contracture requiring significantly extended operative time), modifier 22 applies with supporting documentation.
Site of service matters here. HOPD and ASC facility payments differ substantially (see the Site of Service comparison table). The 90-day global covers the operative day, the day-before visit if applicable, and all routine post-op care through day 90. Anything unrelated billed in that window needs modifier 24 (E/M) or 79 (unrelated procedure).
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 5.91 |
| Practice expense RVU | 4.78 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.57 |
| Total RVU | 11.26 |
| Medicare national rate | $376.09 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $376.09 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27307 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Billing 27306 twice for the same session instead of upgrading to 27307 — NCCI edits will bundle the duplicate
- Operative note documents only one tendon released, contradicting the multiple-tendon requirement of 27307
- Missing or inadequate clinical indication linking the diagnosis (ICD-10) to percutaneous multi-tendon release
- Modifier 22 submitted without supporting documentation showing significantly increased operative time or complexity
- Procedure billed with incorrect approach — open technique documented when percutaneous code was submitted
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 27306 and 27307?
02Can I bill 27306 and 27307 together on the same claim?
03Does the 90-day global period reset if the patient needs an additional tendon released later?
04When is modifier 22 justified for 27307?
05Is fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance separately billable with 27307?
06Can 27307 be billed bilaterally?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02abos.orghttps://www.abos.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/sports-cpt-updated.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific tendon names divided, confirms the percutaneous approach, and flags the operative count of tendons released from the surgeon's dictation. That prevents the most common audit failure on 27307 — notes that say 'multiple tendons' without naming them — which gives payers a straightforward basis to downcode to 27306.
See how Mira captures CPT 27307 documentation