Percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint performed under image guidance, with placement of intra-articular implant(s) — such as bone allograft or a synthetic device — without transfixing the joint.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 9 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $13,754.82
- Total RVUs
- 411.81
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 9 cited references ↓
- Operative note must confirm the device was placed within the SI joint space and did not transfix (pass through ilium, across joint, into sacrum)
- Image guidance modality used (fluoroscopy, CT) and that it was performed intraoperatively
- Implant type documented by name — bone allograft, synthetic device, or trade name — as placed intra-articularly
- Pre-operative diagnosis supported by clinical evaluation, imaging, and conservative treatment failure per applicable LCD criteria (e.g., L39802)
- Laterality documented: left SI joint, right SI joint, or bilateral with separate entries if staged
- Approach and patient positioning noted; audit teams flag notes that omit percutaneous access detail
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 9 cited references ↓
CPT 27278 covers minimally invasive SI joint fusion in which the implant is placed directly into the joint space under image guidance and does not pass through the ilium into the sacrum. That last point — no transfixation — is the defining feature separating 27278 from 27279. If the device crosses the full joint and anchors into the sacrum, use 27279 instead. Image guidance is bundled into 27278; do not bill a separate fluoroscopy or CT guidance code on the same claim.
The code carries a 90-day global period. All routine post-op visits, wound checks, and related E&M services through day 90 are included in the surgical payment. Unrelated problems seen during that window require modifier 24 on the E&M. A new, unrelated procedure in the global period requires modifier 79.
For hybrid devices that combine intra-articular and transfixing components, there is no officially endorsed dual-code pathway. NASS recommends unlisted spine code 22899 for hybrid techniques. Cigna Policy #0303 lists the hybrid approach as experimental/investigational. An NCCI edit bundles 27278 into 27279 when both are submitted together — the column-one code (27279) will pay and 27278 will deny. Confirm carrier-specific guidance before billing any hybrid procedure.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 7.66 |
| Practice expense RVU | 403.3 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.85 |
| Total RVU | 411.81 |
| Medicare national rate | $13,754.82 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $13,754.82 |
HOPD (APC 5116) Hospital outpatient department | $17,913.59 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $15,047.71 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27278 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Transfixing device used intraoperatively but 27278 billed — payer or NCCI edit downcodes or denies in favor of 27279
- Separate image guidance code billed alongside 27278 — guidance is bundled and will deny
- LCD medical necessity criteria not met: inadequate documentation of conservative treatment failure prior to fusion
- Hybrid device procedure billed as 27278 or dual-coded 27278 + 27279 — NCCI edit bundles 27278 into 27279; hybrid techniques may trigger experimental/investigational denial under certain payer policies
- Routine post-op E&M billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global period and denied as included in global
- Missing laterality modifier when bilateral procedures performed, causing claim rejection or edit
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 9 cited references ↓
01What is the key difference between CPT 27278 and CPT 27279?
02Can I bill a separate image guidance code with 27278?
03How do I code a hybrid SI joint device that uses both intra-articular and transfixing components?
04What modifiers apply if I perform bilateral SI joint fusions at the same session?
05What does the 90-day global period cover for 27278?
06Is 27278 covered by Medicare, and are there LCD requirements?
07Can I report a pre-operative E&M on the same day as 27278?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02nimblercm.comhttps://nimblercm.com/mastering-si-joint-fusion-coding-cpt-27278-27279/
- 03nimblercm.comhttps://nimblercm.com/decoding-the-selection-criteria-between-27278-and-27279-si-joint-fusion-codes/
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/blog/93667-cpt-2026-coding-sacroiliac-joint-fusion/
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=59957&ver=3
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleId=59962&ver=4
- 07cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?lcdId=39802&ver=8
- 08cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-3.pdf
- 09prnewswire.comhttps://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ama-introduces-new-category-i-cpt-code-27278-for-posterior-si-joint-fusion-301958364.html
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the implant type and placement site (intra-articular, no transfixation), the image guidance modality used, laterality, and the surgeon's explicit statement that the device did not cross into the sacrum. That documentation directly prevents the most common audit flag on 27278 — an operative note that doesn't distinguish the procedure from a transfixing 27279, triggering a post-payment takebacks or NCCI bundling denial.
See how Mira captures CPT 27278 documentation