Open treatment of acetabular fracture(s) involving the posterior wall, posterior column, or both, with internal fixation.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,489.35
- Total RVUs
- 44.59
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hip
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Fracture pattern specified as posterior wall, posterior column, or posterior wall + posterior column combination
- Surgical approach named explicitly (e.g., Kocher-Langenbeck, Gibson, or extensile posterior)
- Imaging findings (CT pelvis) correlating fracture anatomy to operative findings
- Internal fixation constructs documented — plate type, screw count, and placement
- Intraoperative fluoroscopy or imaging confirming reduction quality
- Neurovascular status of sciatic nerve documented pre- and post-operatively
- Operative note distinguishes posterior from anterior column involvement to justify 27227 vs. 27228
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 27227 covers open surgical treatment of acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall, posterior column, or a combination of both, with internal fixation. These are high-energy injuries — typically from motor vehicle trauma or falls from height — and the code reflects the complexity of exposing and reconstructing the posterior acetabular architecture through a Kocher-Langenbeck or similar approach.
The 90-day global period means that all routine post-op management, wound checks, and implant-related visits through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24; a significant, separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery requires modifier 25. If a planned staged procedure follows (e.g., conversion to THA), use modifier 58. An unplanned return to the OR for a related complication uses modifier 78; an unrelated return uses modifier 79.
Distinguish 27227 from 27228, which covers anterior wall/column fractures or transverse and T-type patterns. Coding the wrong variant is one of the most common audit triggers for acetabular ORIF claims. Operative notes must name the specific fracture pattern and confirm posterior approach anatomy to support 27227 over 27228.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 24.77 |
| Practice expense RVU | 14.56 |
| Malpractice RVU | 5.26 |
| Total RVU | 44.59 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,489.35 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,489.35 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,897.46 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27227 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Fracture pattern documented as anterior or transverse — maps to 27228, not 27227
- Operative note says 'standard approach' without naming the posterior approach — flags for audit
- Missing correlation between preoperative CT fracture classification and intraoperative findings
- Global period conflict: post-op E/M billed without modifier 24 for an unrelated condition
- Upcoding flag when bilateral modifier 50 is appended — bilateral acetabular ORIF is exceptionally rare and will be reviewed
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 27227 and 27228?
02Can 27227 and 27228 be billed together for a complex combined fracture?
03What global period applies to 27227 and what does it include?
04When is modifier 22 appropriate with 27227?
05How should a same-day E/M be handled if the surgeon evaluates the patient in the ED before taking them to the OR?
06Can 27227 be billed with hip dislocation reduction codes on the same day?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04ama-assn.orghttps://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/cpt-assistant-may2022-update-musculoskeletal.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/resident-guide-to-coding-and-practice-management/coding-reimbursement-for-residents/coding-articles-for-residents/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture pattern classification (posterior wall, posterior column, or combined), surgical approach by name, fixation construct details, and sciatic nerve status from dictation. This prevents the most common 27227 denial: an operative note that fails to distinguish posterior from anterior column involvement, which auditors use to remap the claim to 27228.
See how Mira captures CPT 27227 documentation