Surgical · Hip

27140

Osteotomy and distal-lateral transfer of the greater trochanter of the femur, reported as a separate procedure.

Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓

Medicare
$830.35
Total RVUs
24.86
Global, days
90
Region
Hip
Drawn from CMSAAPCNIHMdclarity

Documentation requirements

What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓

  • Specify the indication: coxa vara, abductor dysfunction, trochanteric overgrowth, or impingement — vague 'hip deformity' invites medical necessity denial.
  • Describe the osteotomy technique: type of cut, direction of transfer (distal, lateral, or both), and fixation method (screws, wires, cables).
  • Record intraoperative imaging used to confirm trochanteric position and hardware placement.
  • Document failed or contraindicated conservative management prior to surgical intervention.
  • Note laterality explicitly (left, right, or bilateral) in both the operative report and the procedure order.
  • Include pre-op imaging (X-ray, CT) that quantifies the deformity and supports the planned correction.

Applicable modifiers

Modifiers commonly billed with this code.

Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual

What this code covers

Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓

CPT 27140 covers the surgical detachment and repositioning of the greater trochanter — the bony prominence on the proximal-lateral femur where the hip abductors attach. The surgeon cuts the trochanter free, then translates it distally and laterally before reattaching it with hardware. The goal is to restore or improve abductor mechanics, correct coxa vara, or address trochanteric overgrowth that limits hip motion or causes impingement.

This is a 90-day global procedure. All routine post-op visits, wound checks, and hardware monitoring within that window are bundled. Separate E/M visits during the global require modifier 24 (unrelated condition) or modifier 79 (unrelated surgical procedure). Staged procedures in the same global — for example, hardware removal planned at the time of the index surgery — use modifier 58.

Site of service matters for reimbursement. HOPD and ASC facility payments differ substantially; see the Site of Service comparison table on this page. When 27140 is performed bilaterally, append modifier 50 or report it with LT/RT on separate lines per payer preference. Confirm with the payer — Medicare accepts modifier 50 on a single line; some commercial payers require two lines.

RVU & reimbursement

Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.

Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026

Work RVU12.46
Practice expense RVU9.75
Malpractice RVU2.65
Total RVU24.86
Medicare national rate$830.35
Global period90 days

Payment by site of service

Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.

Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026

SettingMedicare rate (national)
Office (PFS non-facility)
Procedure performed in physician's office
$830.35
HOPD (APC 5114)
Hospital outpatient department
$7,413.38
ASC (PI G2)
Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding)
$3,695.53

Common denial reasons

The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27140 get rejected.

Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓

  • Medical necessity not established — operative note lacks pre-op imaging findings or failed conservative care history.
  • Laterality mismatch between the claim, the operative report, and the authorization on file.
  • Global period conflict — post-op E/M billed without modifier 24 when unrelated, or without modifier 58 for staged hardware removal.
  • Missing or incorrect modifier when billed bilaterally — payer expected two-line LT/RT but received a single-line modifier 50, or vice versa.
  • Procedure billed without supporting diagnosis code that maps to an accepted indication for trochanteric transfer.

Frequently asked questions

Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓

01Is 27140 ever billed with a total hip arthroplasty on the same day?
It can be, but expect NCCI scrutiny. Trochanteric osteotomy performed as a surgical approach to a THA is bundled into the arthroplasty code — it is not separately reportable in that context. 27140 is payable separately only when the trochanteric transfer is performed as a distinct reconstructive procedure with its own indication, not merely as an access technique. Append modifier 59 or XS only if you can document a clearly separate procedural indication, and be prepared to support it on audit.
02What modifier do I use for a planned hardware removal after 27140?
Modifier 58 — staged or related procedure during the global period. Hardware removal planned at the time of the index trochanteric transfer (and documented as such in the original operative note or discharge summary) is a staged procedure, not an unplanned return. Don't use modifier 78 here; 78 is for unplanned returns to the OR for a complication.
03Can 27140 be billed bilaterally?
Yes, bilateral trochanteric transfer is reportable. Medicare accepts modifier 50 appended to 27140 on a single claim line. Many commercial payers want two separate lines with LT and RT. Verify payer preference before submitting — a modifier 50 claim sent to a payer expecting two lines will reject on format, not on coverage.
04What ICD-10 codes typically pair with 27140?
Common pairings include coxa vara (M16.x series or Q65.89 for congenital), hip abductor dysfunction sequelae, and specific femoral deformity codes. The diagnosis must quantify or describe the structural problem that necessitates transfer — a symptom code alone (e.g., hip pain M25.551) will not support medical necessity for an osteotomy.
05Does the 90-day global include physical therapy referrals and DME orders?
No. The global bundles only the surgeon's services — post-op visits, wound care, and routine monitoring. PT referrals and DME orders are separately reimbursable and are not part of the surgical global. The surgeon's direct participation in a PT session would be bundled; the PT's independent services are not.
06How does modifier 22 apply to a particularly complex trochanteric transfer?
If the procedure required substantially increased work — for example, revision after failed prior osteotomy with hardware removal, severe deformity requiring custom positioning or extended OR time — append modifier 22 and attach a cover letter quantifying the additional work. CMS expects the operative note to document why the case exceeded typical complexity. Expect manual review and a possible payment bump of 20–30%, though the actual increase is payer-determined.

Mira AI Scribe

Mira's AI scribe captures the specific indication (coxa vara angle, abductor insufficiency grade, impingement source), the osteotomy technique, direction and magnitude of trochanteric transfer, fixation hardware used, and intraoperative imaging confirmation from the surgeon's dictation. That detail closes the medical necessity gap that triggers denials when operative notes read as generic 'hip reconstruction' without deformity quantification.

See how Mira captures CPT 27140 documentation

Related CPT codes

Ready?

Ready to transform your orthopedic practice?

See how orthopedic practices are running documentation, billing, and operations on a single voice-first platform.

Get started for free