Acetabuloplasty with resection of the femoral head — the Girdlestone procedure — performed to relieve pain when infection or bone quality precludes joint reconstruction.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,010.71
- Total RVUs
- 30.26
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hip
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Operative note must explicitly confirm femoral head resection and describe the acetabular modification performed — 'standard approach' language is insufficient.
- Document the clinical indication driving the resection choice: active hip infection, failed prior arthroplasty with poor bone stock, or another reason reconstruction was contraindicated.
- Confirm no prosthetic implant was placed — any implant charge on the same claim will trigger a mismatch audit.
- If a staged conversion to THA is anticipated, document that intent in the original operative note before appending modifier 58 to the future procedure.
- Pathology or intraoperative culture results should be referenced if infection is the primary indication — supports medical necessity under the applicable ICD-10 code.
- Assistant surgeon participation requires documentation of active intraoperative role; primary surgeon signature on the operative report is sufficient per CMS Claims Processing Manual.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 27122 covers acetabuloplasty combined with femoral head resection, commonly called the Girdlestone procedure. The surgeon reshapes the acetabulum and removes the femoral head entirely — there is no prosthesis placed. The indication is typically a severe hip infection that has destroyed the joint or a patient whose bone stock cannot support reconstructive arthroplasty. The result is a resection arthroplasty: the patient ambulates on soft tissue rather than a reconstructed joint, often with a Trendelenburg gait.
This is a 90-day global procedure. Every routine post-op visit, wound check, and dressing change through day 90 is bundled. Separately billable services in that window require modifier 24 (unrelated E/M) or 78 (unplanned return to OR for a related complication). If a staged conversion to total hip arthroplasty is planned, use modifier 58 on the subsequent procedure — this resets the global clock and signals the staged intent documented in the original operative note.
Do not confuse 27122 with 27120 (acetabuloplasty without femoral head resection) or 27125 (hemiarthroplasty with prosthesis placement). The operative note must confirm both components — acetabular modification and femoral head removal — with no implant placed. Payers audit this code for implant claims submitted on the same date, which is a red flag.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 15.69 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.24 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.33 |
| Total RVU | 30.26 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,010.71 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,010.71 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27122 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Wrong code selected — 27120 (acetabuloplasty without resection) or 27125 (hemiarthroplasty with prosthesis) billed when 27122 is the correct code for resection arthroplasty without implant.
- Medical necessity not established — payers require documentation of why reconstruction or arthroplasty was contraindicated; missing infection records or bone quality narrative leads to denial.
- Implant charges submitted on the same date conflict with the no-prosthesis nature of the Girdlestone procedure and trigger automatic review.
- Post-op services billed without modifier 24 or 25 during the 90-day global period are bundled and denied.
- Unplanned return to OR for a related complication billed without modifier 78 — payers deny the second claim as already included in the global.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Is 27122 the right code for a Girdlestone procedure?
02What's the difference between 27120 and 27122?
03Can you bill 27122 and 27125 together on the same date?
04How do you handle a planned conversion to THA after a Girdlestone?
05Does the 90-day global include treatment of a post-op infection?
06When is modifier 22 appropriate for 27122?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/27122
- 03vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2021/code/27122/info
- 04workerscomp.nm.govhttps://www.workerscomp.nm.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/NewMexicoPFS2026.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 06novitas-solutions.comhttps://www.novitas-solutions.com/webcenter/portal/MedicareJL/pagebyid?contentId=00144529
- 07aapcperfect.s3.amazonaws.comhttp://aapcperfect.s3.amazonaws.com/a3c7c3fe-6fa1-4d67-8534-a3c9c8315fa0/78859f26-0414-4890-ab1e-b0ccd2d56524/5f5676b1-9e6c-4e3d-8486-515e8e06c067.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific acetabular modification technique, confirmation of femoral head removal, absence of implant placement, and the clinical rationale (infection severity, bone stock quality) from the surgeon's dictation. That detail prevents the two most common denials: upcoding flags from reviewers who confuse 27122 with 27125, and medical necessity rejections when the operative note fails to explain why reconstruction was not performed.
See how Mira captures CPT 27122 documentation