Surgical reshaping or reconstruction of the acetabulum (hip socket) to correct deformity, relieve impingement, or address dysplasia — performed without prosthetic joint replacement.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,182.73
- Total RVUs
- 35.41
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hip
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify the named technique performed (e.g., Whitman, Colonna, Haygroves, cup-type) — 'standard acetabuloplasty' is insufficient for audit defense.
- Document the indication with specificity: congenital dysplasia, acquired deformity, osteoarthritis — and why joint preservation was chosen over replacement.
- Include preoperative imaging (X-ray, CT, or MRI) findings in the operative note or referenced directly in the record to support medical necessity.
- Confirm in the operative note that no prosthetic acetabular component was implanted — absence of implant distinguishes 27120 from 27130/27137.
- Document laterality explicitly (left, right, or bilateral) to support modifier application and payer audit review.
- Record patient age and skeletal maturity when the indication involves congenital or developmental pathology, as payers may scrutinize medical necessity for adult patients.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 27120 covers acetabuloplasty: open surgical remodeling of the acetabular cup to restore normal hip joint mechanics. Historically associated with procedures such as Whitman, Colonna, Haygroves, and cup-type techniques, this code applies when the surgeon modifies the bony architecture of the socket itself rather than implanting a prosthetic component. Indications include congenital hip dysplasia, acetabular insufficiency, and select cases of hip osteoarthritis where joint preservation — not replacement — is the goal.
This is not a total hip arthroplasty code. If you're billing for a procedure that includes an acetabular prosthetic component, you're in the 27130–27138 range. 27120 sits in the osteotomy/hip reconstruction category alongside 27122 (Girdlestone resection) and is tracked by ACGME fellowship programs under 'Osteotomy Hip.' The 90-day global period applies: all routine post-op care through day 90 is bundled. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24; a separately identifiable same-day E/M needs modifier 25.
Site-of-service matters here. CMS assigns an OPPS status indicator of 'C' for 27120, meaning it is not separately payable in the hospital outpatient or ASC setting under Medicare — it is packaged or not recognized as independently reimbursable in those environments. Physician billing follows the Physician Fee Schedule regardless of setting, but facility payment strategy must account for this packaging status.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 18.77 |
| Practice expense RVU | 12.65 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.99 |
| Total RVU | 35.41 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,182.73 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,182.73 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $9,493.97 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 27120 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding to 27130 or 27137 when no prosthetic component was placed — auditors look for implant invoices that don't match the billed code.
- Medical necessity not established: operative note lacks imaging correlation or fails to explain why reconstruction rather than replacement was performed.
- Facility billing 27120 as separately payable in the HOPD or ASC setting — CMS OPPS status indicator 'C' packages or excludes this code in those environments.
- Missing laterality modifier when payer policy requires LT or RT for unilateral hip procedures.
- Global period violations: billing routine post-op E/M visits within the 90-day global without modifier 24, triggering automatic denial.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 27120 and CPT 27130?
02Can 27120 be billed in an ASC or hospital outpatient department under Medicare?
03What is the global period for 27120?
04When is modifier 22 appropriate with 27120?
05Can 27120 and 27130 be billed together on the same operative session?
06Is 27120 ever billed bilaterally?
07What ICD-10 diagnoses support medical necessity for 27120?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/03-chapter3-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04acgme.orghttps://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programresources/261_caselogguidelines_adultreconstructiveorthopaedicsurgery.pdf
- 05zimmerbiomet.comhttps://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zb-corporate/en/support/coding-guides/0772.7-US-en%20Hip%20Systems%20Coding%20Reference%20Guide.pdf
- 06aapcperfect.s3.amazonaws.comhttp://aapcperfect.s3.amazonaws.com/a3c7c3fe-6fa1-4d67-8534-a3c9c8315fa0/78859f26-0414-4890-ab1e-b0ccd2d56524/5f5676b1-9e6c-4e3d-8486-515e8e06c067.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the named acetabuloplasty technique from dictation (Whitman, Colonna, Haygroves, cup-type), the specific indication (dysplasia, impingement, osteoarthritis), laterality, and explicit confirmation that no prosthetic component was implanted. That last capture point prevents the most common audit flag on 27120: an operative note that reads ambiguously enough to look like a partial arthroplasty, inviting a 27130 upcoding allegation or a medical necessity denial.
See how Mira captures CPT 27120 documentation