Open surgical treatment of a distal phalanx fracture of the finger or thumb, including internal fixation when performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $486.65
- Total RVUs
- 14.57
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must describe surgical exposure of the distal phalanx fracture site — not just percutaneous pin insertion
- Specify which digit(s) were treated and laterality (left vs. right hand, specific finger)
- Document all fixation hardware used: K-wires, screws, plates, or intramedullary devices
- Record intraoperative fluoroscopy or X-ray confirmation of fracture reduction when performed
- If converted from attempted closed reduction, document the failed attempt and rationale for open approach
- ICD-10-CM code must specify the correct phalanx (distal), finger, laterality, and encounter type (initial vs. subsequent)
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 26765 covers open treatment of a distal phalangeal fracture — finger or thumb — with or without internal fixation. 'Open treatment' means the surgeon surgically exposes the fracture site for direct visualization, then stabilizes it using implants such as K-wires, screws, or plates before closing. This is distinct from closed or percutaneous treatment; the operative note must reflect actual surgical exposure, not just skin-level access for pin placement.
A critical billing distinction: an open (traumatic) fracture diagnosis does not automatically justify 26765. The procedure code is driven by the surgical method, not the wound classification. If the surgeon sets and splints a traumatically open distal phalanx fracture without operative exposure, that is closed treatment — report 26750 or 26756, not 26765. Auditors cross-reference the operative report against the ICD-10 encounter type; mismatches are a common denial trigger.
The code carries a 90-day global period. Routine post-op visits, hardware checks, and dressing changes within that window are bundled. If the fracture involves multiple digits, report 26765 for each digit treated with open reduction, using laterality modifiers (LT/RT) and modifier 59 to distinguish separate operative sites. When open debridement of contaminated bone is performed before definitive fixation, codes 11010–11012 may be separately reportable.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 5.71 |
| Practice expense RVU | 7.74 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.12 |
| Total RVU | 14.57 |
| Medicare national rate | $486.65 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $486.65 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26765 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note documents only percutaneous pin placement without surgical exposure — correct code is 26756, not 26765
- Open (traumatic) wound diagnosis coded as justification for 26765 when the surgical approach was actually closed treatment
- Multiple digits billed without laterality or digit-specific modifiers, triggering duplicate-service edits
- E/M service billed same-day without modifier 25, bundled into the minor surgical procedure payment
- Missing or vague operative note that references 'standard approach' without naming the exposure technique
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 26765 just because the fracture diagnosis is coded as an open fracture?
02If I treat two digits on the same hand, do I bill 26765 twice?
03The surgeon attempted closed reduction first, then converted to open. How do I code that?
04Is debridement separately billable when performed before open fixation of a contaminated fracture?
05What global period applies to 26765, and what does it cover?
06Can an E/M be billed on the same day as 26765?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/coding-newsletters/my-orthopedic-coding-alert/orthopedic-coding-coding-finger-fractures-doesnt-have-to-be-daunting-179360-article/rci
- 03jucm.comhttps://www.jucm.com/open-fracture-treatment-versus-closed-fracture-treatment/
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26765
- 06eatonhand.comhttp://www.eatonhand.com/coding/n26765.htm
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgical exposure method, specific digit and laterality, fixation hardware type, intraoperative imaging confirmation, and any conversion narrative from failed closed reduction — directly from dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag: an operative note that supports 26756 (percutaneous) being billed as 26765 (open), and protects against laterality-related claim edits on multi-digit cases.
See how Mira captures CPT 26765 documentation