Opponensplasty using a superficialis (flexor digitorum superficialis) tendon transfer to restore thumb opposition function — the ability to move the thumb across the palm to meet the fingertips.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $821.33
- Total RVUs
- 24.59
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Preoperative diagnosis specifying the etiology of opposition loss (e.g., median nerve palsy, thenar atrophy, post-traumatic dysfunction)
- Identification of the donor tendon used — specify flexor digitorum superficialis and which digit it was harvested from
- Operative note describing the routing path of the tendon transfer, pulley construction, and method of distal attachment
- Intraoperative confirmation of restored passive or active opposition arc before wound closure
- Postoperative splinting or immobilization plan, including position and duration, to support healing of the transfer
- If modifier 22 is appended, explicit narrative in the operative note quantifying the additional complexity and time beyond the typical procedure
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 26490 describes an opponensplasty in which the surgeon reroutes a flexor digitorum superficialis tendon to reconstruct the opponens mechanism of the thumb. The goal is to restore opposition — the arc of motion that allows the thumb to oppose the fingertips — lost due to median nerve palsy, thenar muscle atrophy, trauma, or prior failed reconstruction. This is a distinct procedure from 26492, which adds a free tendon graft; 26490 uses the superficialis tendon directly without a separate graft harvest.
The 90-day global period means all routine follow-up, splinting checks, and suture removal through day 90 are bundled. Any unrelated procedure in that window needs modifier 79; a staged or planned secondary procedure needs modifier 58; an unplanned return to the OR for a related complication takes modifier 78. If significantly increased intraoperative complexity — such as dense adhesions from prior surgery — drove substantially more work, modifier 22 applies with supporting operative note documentation.
Site of service matters for this code. HOPD and ASC payments differ substantially; see the site-of-service comparison table. Bilateral opponensplasty (rare, but possible in bilateral median nerve palsy) is reported with modifier 50. When a co-surgeon participates, both surgeons append modifier 62 and each documents their distinct intraoperative role.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 8.39 |
| Practice expense RVU | 14.43 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.77 |
| Total RVU | 24.59 |
| Medicare national rate | $821.33 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $821.33 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26490 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note lacks specificity on donor tendon source and routing — payers flag generic 'tendon transfer' language without anatomic detail
- 26490 and 26492 confused at claim submission — 26492 requires a free graft harvest and is a distinct, higher-value code; miscoding triggers downcoding or denial
- Services billed during the 90-day global period of a prior hand procedure without a 24, 58, 78, or 79 modifier to break the global
- Modifier 22 submitted without an attached operative note narrative explaining the increased work, leading to flat denial of the add-on payment
- Bilateral claim submitted without modifier 50, causing the second-thumb service to deny as a duplicate
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 26490 and 26492?
02Can 26490 be billed bilaterally?
03Does the 90-day global period affect therapy or splinting follow-up?
04When does modifier 58 apply versus modifier 78?
05Is a co-surgeon arrangement billable for 26490?
06What ICD-10 diagnoses most commonly support 26490?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-policy-manual
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26490
- 05mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/26490
- 06ebhmc.comhttps://ebhmc.com/cpt/
- 07qpp.cms.govhttps://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_quality_measure_specifications/CQM-Measures/2025_Measure_358_MIPSCQM.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the donor tendon identity (FDS, specify digit), the routing path through the pulley or constructed pulley, the distal attachment site on the thumb, and the intraoperative opposition arc achieved. That specificity prevents the generic 'tendon transfer' language that triggers payer requests for operative notes or outright downcoding to a lesser reconstruction code.
See how Mira captures CPT 26490 documentation