Excision of a flexor tendon with implantation of a synthetic rod to prepare the finger or hand for a delayed tendon graft — Stage 1 of a two-stage Hunter rod reconstruction.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $851.39
- Total RVUs
- 25.49
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify which tendon(s) were excised (e.g., FDP zone II, index finger) — 'flexor tendon' alone is insufficient.
- Document the extent of tendon scarring or prior injury that makes single-stage repair or grafting unfeasible.
- Record the size and position of the synthetic rod implanted, including the specific digit and zone.
- Confirm the staged nature of the reconstruction and that Stage 2 (26392) is planned — supports medical necessity for the rod implantation.
- Identify the surgical approach and any concurrent procedures performed (e.g., pulley reconstruction) to defend against bundling challenges.
- Note laterality (left or right hand) and affected digit in both the operative note and the claim.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 26390 covers Stage 1 of the Hunter two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction: the scarred or damaged flexor tendon is excised and a silicone rod is implanted to create a new tendon sheath (pseudosheath) in preparation for a later graft. It is not a simple tendon repair — it is a staged reconstruction technique used when the tendon bed is too scarred for primary repair or single-stage grafting. Stage 2, rod removal and graft insertion, is reported separately with 26392.
The 90-day global period attaches to 26390. If the patient returns for the planned Stage 2 procedure (26392) within that window, bill 26392 with modifier 58 — staged or related procedure by the same surgeon during the postoperative period. Do not use modifier 79, which is reserved for unrelated procedures. If an unplanned return for a related complication (e.g., rod migration requiring revision) occurs within the global, modifier 78 applies.
Code 26390 carries a 'separate procedure' designation in some contexts — if billed on the same day as a more comprehensive hand procedure, NCCI edits may bundle it. Use modifier 59 or XS only when the rod implantation is genuinely distinct from other same-session work, with documentation to support it.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 9.19 |
| Practice expense RVU | 14.34 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.96 |
| Total RVU | 25.49 |
| Medicare national rate | $851.39 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $851.39 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,682.29 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26390 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) — many payers require it on hand surgery claims.
- 26392 billed without modifier 58 when performed within the 26390 global period, triggering a global period denial.
- Insufficient documentation of why single-stage repair or primary graft was not feasible — payers may deny as not medically necessary.
- Bundling denial when 26390 is billed same-session with a more comprehensive procedure without modifier 59 or XS and supporting documentation.
- Claim submitted with modifier 79 instead of 58 for the planned Stage 2 return — modifier inversion causes systematic denial.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 26390 and 26392?
02Which modifier goes on 26392 when it falls within the 26390 global period?
03Is an assistant surgeon billable on 26390?
04Can 26390 be billed bilaterally?
05Does 26390 carry a global period, and how does that affect the Stage 2 visit?
06What ICD-10 diagnoses typically support 26390?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/transmittals/downloads/r3674cp.pdf
- 03emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 04vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2021/code/26390/info
- 05ebhmc.comhttps://ebhmc.com/cpt/
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/healthcare-common-procedure-system
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific tendon excised, affected digit and zone, synthetic rod size and placement, the degree of tendon bed scarring justifying staged reconstruction, and planned timing for Stage 2. This prevents the two most common 26390 denials: vague operative notes that fail medical necessity review and missing laterality that auto-denies at claims adjudication.
See how Mira captures CPT 26390 documentation