Surgical drainage of multiple palmar bursas in a single hand through open incision to evacuate fluid from more than one bursal sac.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $465.94
- Total RVUs
- 13.95
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Hand
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Confirm and document the number of distinct palmar bursas drained — must be more than one to support 26030 over 26025.
- Identify which bursas were drained by name (radial bursa, ulnar bursa) and confirm both are in the same hand.
- Document clinical indications: persistent swelling, failed antibiotic therapy, infection, or functional impairment.
- Record the surgical approach, incision location(s), volume and character of fluid drained, and irrigation performed.
- Specify laterality (right hand or left hand) in the operative note and on the claim.
- Note anesthesia type and surgical setting (office, ASC, or HOPD) to support place-of-service coding.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 26030 covers open incision and drainage of multiple palmar bursas — use it when the operative note documents more than one bursal sac drained in the same palm. The dividing line between 26025 and 26030 is bursa count: 26025 is for a single palmar bursa; 26030 applies when two or more are drained. There are two distinct palmar bursas (radial and ulnar), so bilateral single-bursa drainage on both hands does not automatically qualify for 26030 — the multiple bursas must be in the same hand.
The 90-day global period applies. All routine post-op palm care, dressing changes, and wound checks within that window are included. A separate E/M in the global period requires modifier 24 (unrelated) or 79 (unrelated return procedure). The code carries a work RVU of 6.09 and a non-facility total RVU of 13.95 under the 2026 CMS Physician Fee Schedule.
Bilateral drainage documented as one bursa per hand should be coded 26025-LT and 26025-RT — not 26030 with modifier 50. Medicare has denied claims coded that way for frequency errors. If the operative setting is an ASC or HOPD, confirm the correct place-of-service code, as facility payment rates differ substantially from the non-facility rate.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 6.09 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.67 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.19 |
| Total RVU | 13.95 |
| Medicare national rate | $465.94 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $465.94 |
HOPD (APC 5113) Hospital outpatient department | $3,342.87 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,644.87 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 26030 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding from 26025: insufficient documentation that more than one bursa was drained — note only references 'palmar bursa' generically.
- Bilateral single-bursa claims coded as 26030 with modifier 50 denied for frequency; each hand with one bursa drained should be 26025-LT and 26025-RT.
- Missing laterality modifier causes claim rejection or bundling errors on same-session hand procedures.
- Global period conflict: E/M billed within the 90-day post-op window without modifier 24 to establish the visit as unrelated.
- Place-of-service mismatch: procedure performed in ASC or HOPD but billed with non-facility RVU, or vice versa.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 26025 and CPT 26030?
02Can I bill 26030 with modifier 50 for bilateral palmar bursa drainage?
03What is the global period for CPT 26030?
04Which ICD-10 codes are commonly linked to CPT 26030?
05Does the place of service affect reimbursement for CPT 26030?
06When is modifier 22 appropriate for CPT 26030?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/26030
- 03abos.orghttps://www.abos.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/hand-cpt-updated.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/26030
- 05eatonhand.comhttps://www.eatonhand.com/coding/cpt18.htm
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-add-code-edits
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the bursa count, laterality, and character of each drained sac directly from dictation — distinguishing 'radial and ulnar bursas of the right palm' from a single-bursa drainage that would support only 26025. That specificity prevents the most common audit flag on 26030: an operative note that says 'palmar bursa' without confirming multiple structures were addressed.
See how Mira captures CPT 26030 documentation