Open surgical repair of a trans-scaphoperilunar fracture-dislocation of the wrist, including internal fixation to restore carpal alignment.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $691.40
- Total RVUs
- 20.7
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify the surgical approach by name (dorsal, volar, or combined) — notes that say 'standard approach' draw audit scrutiny
- Document the pattern of injury: scaphoid fracture site, perilunate dislocation direction, and which carpal bones were displaced
- Identify all fixation hardware used (K-wires, headless compression screws, plates) with size and number
- Record intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of reduction and hardware position
- Document neurovascular status pre- and post-reduction, including median nerve assessment given carpal tunnel proximity
- If modifier 22 is appended, the operative note must explicitly describe what made the work substantially greater than typical — chronic dislocation, prior failed reduction, or severe comminution
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 25685 covers open treatment of a trans-scaphoperilunar fracture-dislocation — a high-energy wrist injury involving fracture through the scaphoid combined with perilunar disruption. The surgeon opens the wrist through a dorsal, volar, or combined approach, reduces the dislocated carpal bones, and stabilizes the construct with internal fixation hardware (screws, K-wires, or plates). This is not a simple distal radius repair; the complexity of carpal realignment distinguishes it from codes like 25600–25609.
The 90-day global period governs all routine post-op management. Unrelated E/M visits during the global window require modifier 24. If you're also treating a concurrent distal radius fracture or ligamentous injury at the same session, modifier 51 applies to the secondary procedure, and documentation must justify each separately billable component.
Site of service matters here. HOPD and ASC payments differ substantially — see the Site of Service comparison table. Most of these cases land in the OR given anesthesia requirements and implant needs, so confirm your facility designation before submitting.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 9.84 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.77 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.09 |
| Total RVU | 20.7 |
| Medicare national rate | $691.40 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $691.40 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25685 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Diagnosis code mismatch — ICD-10 must capture both the scaphoid fracture and the perilunar dislocation components; a single fracture code without the dislocation component is insufficient
- Modifier 22 submitted without supporting documentation of increased complexity in the operative note
- Bundling conflict when fluoroscopy is billed separately — fluoroscopic guidance used solely to confirm reduction is integral to 25685 and not separately reimbursable
- Global period billing errors — post-op visits for routine wound care or hardware checks submitted without modifier 24 or 79 are denied as included in the 90-day global
- Bilateral modifier 50 applied incorrectly — trans-scaphoperilunar fracture-dislocations are almost never bilateral, and payers flag this combination for review
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01How does 25685 differ from 25670 (open treatment of radiocarpal or intercarpal dislocation)?
02Can I bill 25685 and 25645 together if I also fix a separate carpal bone fracture at the same session?
03Is modifier 22 defensible for a chronic trans-scaphoperilunar dislocation with AVN?
04What happens if the procedure is stopped after incision but before fixation is completed?
05Does the 90-day global include carpal tunnel release if median nerve symptoms develop post-op?
06Can an assistant surgeon bill for 25685?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2018/code/25685/info
- 03abos.orghttps://www.abos.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/sports-cpt-updated.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/25685
- 06findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/25685-cpt-code.html
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the approach name, carpal bones involved, reduction method, fixation hardware with count and size, and intraoperative fluoroscopy findings directly from dictation. That prevents the two most common audit flags on 25685: an operative note that omits the specific dislocation pattern and a note that can't support modifier 22 when increased complexity is claimed.
See how Mira captures CPT 25685 documentation