Open treatment of a distal radial intra-articular fracture or epiphyseal separation with internal fixation of exactly 2 fragments.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $771.89
- Total RVUs
- 23.11
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Confirm intra-articular extension of the fracture — extra-articular injuries map to 25607, not 25608
- Explicitly document the number of articular fragments fixed (must be 2 to support 25608; 3+ maps to 25609)
- Specify the fixation construct used (plate, screws, K-wires, or combination) and implant details
- Record laterality (left vs. right) in the operative note and on the claim
- Document fluoroscopic confirmation of reduction and fixation intraoperatively
- Include pre-op imaging (X-ray or CT) that characterizes the fracture pattern and fragment count
- Note any concomitant ulnar styloid fracture treatment — if addressed, document whether it is included or separately billable
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 25608 covers open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture that extends into the joint surface, specifically when 2 articular fragments are fixed. The intra-articular designation is the critical distinction from 25607, which covers extra-articular open treatment. Fragment count drives code selection across the 25607–25609 family: 25607 is extra-articular, 25608 is intra-articular with 2 fragments, and 25609 is intra-articular with 3 or more fragments. Upcoding to 25609 without documented fragment count is a consistent audit trigger.
The 90-day global period covers all routine post-op visits, wound care, cast changes, and hardware checks through day 90. Staged procedures during the global — such as hardware removal or tenolysis — require modifier 58 if planned and related. Unrelated procedures in the same window need modifier 79. E/M visits for a separate problem during the global require modifier 24.
This code is performed across hand surgery, orthopedic surgery, and plastic/reconstructive surgery. Fluoroscopy used intraoperatively is integral to the open fixation and is not separately billable. Nerve block billing (e.g., regional anesthesia) was the subject of a documented Texas dispute in which a payer denied a separately billed block as bundled to 25608; document medical necessity clearly if billing ancillary services on the same date.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 10.79 |
| Practice expense RVU | 10.15 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.17 |
| Total RVU | 23.11 |
| Medicare national rate | $771.89 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $771.89 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,980.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25608 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Fragment count missing or ambiguous in operative note — payer downcodes to 25607 or requests medical records
- Intra-articular extension not documented, resulting in denial or downcode to extra-articular code 25607
- Fluoroscopy billed separately (e.g., 77002) when it is integral to the open fixation procedure
- Laterality modifier absent — claims without LT or RT are rejected by many payers
- Bundling denial when a separately billed nerve block lacks documentation of distinct medical necessity
- Upcoding allegation when 25609 is billed but only 2 fragments are documented — audit risk for the entire claim
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What's the difference between 25607, 25608, and 25609?
02Can I bill fluoroscopy separately when performing 25608?
03Do I need a laterality modifier on 25608?
04If the surgeon also treats an ulnar styloid fracture at the same session, can that be billed separately?
05What modifier applies if the same surgeon performs a staged hardware removal during the 90-day global?
06Can 25608 and 25609 be billed together for bilateral fractures?
07What ICD-10 diagnosis codes pair with 25608?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/25608
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/25608
- 05payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/25608-CPT-fee-schedule
- 06tdi.texas.govhttps://www.tdi.texas.gov/medcases/medfee21/m4210681.pdf
- 07emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures intra-articular fracture characterization, exact fragment count, fixation construct, and laterality directly from the surgeon's dictation. It flags operative notes that state 'ORIF distal radius' without specifying articular involvement or fragment count — the two documentation gaps most likely to trigger a downcode to 25607 or an audit request for records.
See how Mira captures CPT 25608 documentation