Open treatment of a radial shaft fracture with internal fixation, combined with closed reduction of a distal radioulnar joint dislocation (Galeazzi fracture-dislocation), including percutaneous skeletal fixation of the DRUJ when performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $736.82
- Total RVUs
- 22.06
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Wrist
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Confirm radial shaft fracture was treated with open technique and internal fixation
- Explicitly document that the DRUJ dislocation was reduced by closed means — include whether percutaneous skeletal fixation of the DRUJ was performed
- Specify that open DRUJ treatment and TFCC repair were NOT performed (distinguishes 25525 from 25526)
- Record laterality (left or right) in both the operative note and on the claim
- Document pre-operative imaging confirming Galeazzi fracture-dislocation pattern
- If a decision for surgery E/M was billed same-day, confirm modifier 57 is appended and that the note supports the medical decision-making level billed
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 25525 covers the Galeazzi fracture-dislocation treated with open fixation of the radial shaft and closed reduction of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The radial shaft component requires open surgery with internal fixation; the DRUJ component is handled by closed means — with or without percutaneous skeletal fixation. If the DRUJ requires open treatment and TFCC repair, that's 25526, not 25525. The distinction between these two codes turns entirely on how the DRUJ was managed, so the operative note must document the DRUJ reduction technique explicitly.
This is a 90-day global code. Any E/M on the day of or day before surgery needs modifier 57 (decision for major surgery). Routine post-op visits, dressing changes, and cast checks through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated problems billed in the global window need modifier 24. Laterality modifiers LT or RT are required — apply them to the fracture care code.
If additional procedures such as open wound debridement are performed and are not bundled into 25525 per NCCI, append modifier 51 to the secondary code. Confirm NCCI edits before billing 25515 (radial shaft open treatment alone) alongside 25525 — the DRUJ closure component in 25525 already incorporates the radial shaft fixation, making 25515 redundant and potentially triggering a bundling denial.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 10.29 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.71 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.06 |
| Total RVU | 22.06 |
| Medicare national rate | $736.82 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $736.82 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $4,941.39 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 25525 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- DRUJ reduction technique not documented — payer cannot confirm closed vs. open management, triggering downcoding or denial
- Billing 25515 alongside 25525 — radial shaft fixation is already included in 25525, creating an NCCI bundling conflict
- Missing laterality modifier LT or RT on the claim
- Presurgical E/M billed with modifier 25 instead of modifier 57 — this is a 90-day global code requiring modifier 57 for the decision-for-surgery visit
- Operative note states 'standard approach' or 'DRUJ reduced' without specifying technique, flagging the record during audit
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What separates 25525 from 25526?
02Can I bill 25515 and 25525 together?
03Which modifier goes on the pre-op E/M for a 25525 case?
04Is laterality required on the claim?
05If the DRUJ wasn't documented as reduced, should I still bill 25525?
06Can modifier 22 be used with 25525 for unusual complexity?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02fastrvu.comhttps://fastrvu.com/cpt/25525
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/coding-newsletters/my-orthopedic-coding-alert/surgery-remember-to-code-for-all-services-surrounding-radialulnar-fx-174437-article
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/25525
- 05billrazor.comhttps://billrazor.com/procedures/25525-optx-rdl-shft-fx-cltx-rad-ul/
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the radial shaft fixation technique (approach, implant type), the DRUJ reduction method (closed vs. percutaneous vs. open), whether TFCC repair was performed, and laterality — all from dictation. That prevents the most common 25525 denial: an operative note that confirms radial fixation but is silent on how the DRUJ was managed, which auditors and payers treat as insufficient documentation for the combined code.
See how Mira captures CPT 25525 documentation