Stump elongation of the upper extremity through bone graft to increase residual limb length for prosthetic fitting or functional improvement.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,137.30
- Total RVUs
- 34.05
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Operative note must explicitly identify the procedure as stump elongation, not revision or re-amputation
- Document graft type (autogenous vs. allograft) and harvest site if autogenous
- Record fixation method used to secure the graft and achieve elongation
- Quantify the amount of length gained in the residual limb
- Document medical necessity — typically prosthetic fitting failure, inadequate lever arm, or functional deficit from short residual limb
- Prior amputation history including level, laterality, and date of original amputation
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 24935 covers stump elongation of the upper extremity — a surgical procedure in which bone graft (typically autogenous) is used to lengthen the residual limb following a prior amputation through the humerus or at the elbow level. The goal is to improve prosthetic fit, socket suspension, or lever-arm mechanics. This is a distinct procedure from re-amputation (24930) and from secondary closure or scar revision (24925); code selection depends on what is actually being performed, not just that the surgeon returned to a prior amputation site.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op management through day 90 is bundled. If the patient develops a complication requiring a return to the OR for a related procedure during that window, bill with modifier 78. A staged subsequent procedure planned from the outset — such as a delayed bone graft stage — uses modifier 58 and resets the global clock. An unrelated procedure in the global period uses modifier 79.
Documentation must establish that the procedure performed was stump elongation specifically, not revision, re-amputation, or wound management. Operative notes should describe graft harvest site, graft type, fixation method, and the amount of length gained. Vague operative notes that don't distinguish elongation from revision are the primary audit trigger for this code.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 16.04 |
| Practice expense RVU | 14.6 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.41 |
| Total RVU | 34.05 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,137.30 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,137.30 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24935 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note describes revision or wound debridement rather than true stump elongation with bone graft
- Medical necessity not established — no documentation of prosthetic fitting failure or functional limitation from residual limb length
- Incorrect code selected — 24930 (re-amputation) or 24925 (scar revision) billed when elongation was performed
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) required by payer
- Global period conflict — procedure billed during a prior amputation's 90-day global without appropriate modifier (58, 78, or 79)
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 24935 and CPT 24930?
02Can 24935 be billed during the global period of the original amputation?
03Does graft harvest require a separate code?
04Is modifier 50 appropriate for 24935?
05What ICD-10 diagnoses support medical necessity for 24935?
06Does the 90-day global period affect post-op E/M billing?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures graft source and harvest site, fixation technique, residual limb length before and after elongation, and the functional or prosthetic indication from the surgeon's dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag for 24935: an operative note that describes a return to the amputation site without clearly distinguishing elongation from revision or re-amputation.
See how Mira captures CPT 24935 documentation