Transhumeral amputation performed using an open, circular (guillotine) technique — cutting through the soft tissue circumferentially and dividing the bone at the same level, leaving the wound open for subsequent closure.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $687.06
- Total RVUs
- 20.57
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must explicitly name the open, circular (guillotine) technique — not just 'amputation of upper arm'
- Document the clinical indication for open technique rather than primary closure (e.g., infection, vascular compromise, traumatic contamination)
- Record the level of bone transection on the humerus (proximal, mid, distal third)
- Specify laterality — right or left upper arm — to support LT/RT modifier on the claim
- If staged procedure is planned, document intent for secondary closure so modifier 58 on subsequent 24925 claim is supported
- Neurovascular structures addressed (nerve ligation, vessel ligation) should be itemized in the operative note
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 24920 describes a guillotine-style transhumeral amputation in which the surgeon divides soft tissue in a single circular pass around the upper arm and transects the humerus at that level, intentionally leaving the wound open. This open technique is chosen when primary closure is contraindicated — typically in the setting of severe infection, vascular compromise, blast injury, or traumatic amputation requiring débridement before definitive closure. It is the planned first stage of a staged amputation sequence, not a technically inferior alternative to 24900 (primary closure).
The 90-day global period covers the guillotine procedure itself and all routine postoperative management through day 90. If the patient returns for secondary closure or scar revision, that is billed separately under 24925 with modifier 58 (staged procedure). Re-amputation at a more proximal level goes under 24930, also with modifier 58 if within the global. Any neuroma management using nerve cap or targeted muscle reinnervation techniques performed at a separate session requires separate coding — the primary amputation code alone does not capture those services.
Laterality modifiers (LT/RT) are required on every claim. If the contralateral limb is amputated at the same operative session — uncommon but seen in bilateral trauma — append modifier 50 or use LT and RT on separate line items per payer preference. Surgeon documentation must distinguish this procedure from 24900 (primary closure) and 24930 (re-amputation); the operative note needs to state the open, circular technique explicitly and document the clinical rationale for staging.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 9.88 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.59 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.1 |
| Total RVU | 20.57 |
| Medicare national rate | $687.06 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $687.06 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $6,804.43 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24920 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing laterality modifier (LT or RT) — required on all upper extremity amputation claims
- Code billed as 24920 when wound was primarily closed — that maps to 24900, not 24920; mismatched operative note triggers edit
- Subsequent closure (24925) denied when 24920 global is active and modifier 58 was omitted, failing to identify it as a planned staged procedure
- ICD-10 diagnosis code does not support open technique — e.g., elective amputation without documented wound contamination or infection raises medical necessity flags
- Re-amputation billed under 24920 instead of 24930, causing a code-to-clinical-scenario mismatch on audit
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 24920 and CPT 24900?
02If I perform the guillotine amputation (24920) and then return to close the wound, how do I bill the second procedure?
03Does CPT 24920 require a laterality modifier?
04Can I separately bill for nerve management (neuroma prevention) performed at the time of 24920?
05What ICD-10 diagnoses support medical necessity for the open guillotine approach?
06Is 24920 subject to SNF consolidated billing?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/24920
- 03axogeninc.comhttps://www.axogeninc.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024-Neurectomy-Post-Amputation-Coding-and-Billing-Guide-MKTG-0082.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r13573cp.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/advocacy/issues/2021-opps-pr-tables.pdf
- 06findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/24920-cpt-code.html
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the guillotine technique, level of humeral transection, laterality, and the clinical rationale for leaving the wound open (infection, contamination, vascular status). It flags if the dictation says 'primary closure' — which maps to 24900, not 24920 — preventing a downstream coding mismatch that auditors catch on operative note review. For staged cases, the scribe notes planned secondary closure to pre-populate modifier 58 on the follow-up 24925 claim.
See how Mira captures CPT 24920 documentation