Closed treatment of a proximal ulna fracture without manipulation, managed with splinting or casting at the elbow level.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $336.68
- Total RVUs
- 10.08
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Imaging (X-ray or CT) confirming proximal ulna fracture location and acceptable alignment without manipulation
- Explicit statement that no manipulation was performed at the time of treatment
- Description of immobilization applied — splint type, material, and anatomic placement
- Neurovascular status of the affected extremity documented before and after immobilization
- Mechanism of injury and clinical presentation supporting fracture diagnosis
- Plan for follow-up imaging and fracture reassessment within the 90-day global
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 24670 covers closed (non-operative) treatment of a proximal ulnar fracture — the near-elbow end of the ulna — where no bone manipulation is performed. The fracture is stabilized with a splint or cast to maintain position while healing proceeds. Because no manipulation occurs, this code is reserved for fractures already in acceptable alignment at the time of evaluation.
The 90-day global period applies. That window covers the initial treatment visit, the procedure itself, and all routine fracture follow-up through day 90 — cast checks, splint adjustments, and standard healing assessments. Any unrelated E/M service during the global requires modifier 24. If the treating physician decides surgery is warranted at the initial visit and that visit is the decision-for-surgery encounter, modifier 57 applies to the E/M.
Distinguish 24670 from 24675 (closed treatment with manipulation) and from open treatment codes 24685/24686. Billing the wrong variant is a common audit flag. Radiographic findings documenting acceptable alignment without need for reduction are the evidentiary backbone of 24670.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 2.62 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.92 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.54 |
| Total RVU | 10.08 |
| Medicare national rate | $336.68 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $336.68 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $135.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24670 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Code billed as 24670 when operative notes or visit records indicate manipulation was performed — should be 24675
- Separate E/M billed on the same day without modifier 25, triggering bundling denial
- Radiologic supervision/interpretation billed separately when imaging review is integral to fracture management at the same encounter
- ICD-10 diagnosis code does not specify proximal ulna or laterality, creating a mismatch with the procedure code
- Routine follow-up visits billed separately during the 90-day global period without modifier 24 for unrelated conditions
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What separates 24670 from 24675?
02Can I bill a separate E/M on the same day as 24670?
03Does the 90-day global include the cast or splint changes?
04When does modifier 57 apply to the E/M visit for this code?
05How should laterality be reported for 24670?
06Is fluoroscopic guidance separately billable with 24670?
07What if the fracture subsequently requires surgery during the global period?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/24670
- 05mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/24670
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures fracture location (proximal ulna), confirmation that no reduction or manipulation was performed, immobilization type and application, and neurovascular exam findings — all from dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag: operative or visit notes that fail to explicitly state manipulation was not attempted, leaving coders unable to defend 24670 over 24675.
See how Mira captures CPT 24670 documentation