Open surgical repair of a medial or lateral humeral epicondyle fracture at the elbow, with internal fixation applied when needed to stabilize the fragment.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $694.74
- Total RVUs
- 20.8
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify whether the fracture is medial or lateral epicondyle — the code is the same but documentation must match the diagnosis code (ICD-10 laterality required).
- State that the approach was open (direct incision over the epicondyle), not closed or percutaneous — the open approach is what justifies 24575 over closed treatment codes.
- Document whether internal fixation was applied: if yes, specify implant type (e.g., cannulated screw, suture anchor, K-wire) and the rationale for fixation versus no fixation.
- Include fracture characterization — displacement, fragment size, associated ligamentous injury, or concomitant elbow dislocation — to support medical necessity and any modifier 22 claim.
- Record neurovascular status before and after reduction, particularly ulnar nerve assessment for medial epicondyle fractures given proximity of the nerve.
- Operative note must name the approach (e.g., medial or lateral incision) — notes that state only 'standard approach' are audit targets.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 24575 covers open treatment of a humeral epicondylar fracture — medial or lateral — at the elbow. The surgeon makes a direct incision over the affected epicondyle, reduces the fracture, and applies internal fixation hardware (screws, suture anchors, or other implants) when the fracture pattern requires it. The phrase 'when performed' means fixation is not always placed, but the code applies regardless — the critical distinction is that the approach is open, not percutaneous or closed.
This code sits in a family of distal humerus fracture codes. Use 24545/24546 for supracondylar or transcondylar patterns and 24579 for condylar fractures. Epicondylar fractures — the medial epicondyle being far more common, especially in pediatric patients following elbow dislocation — are distinct anatomically and coded separately. Medial versus lateral epicondyle involvement does not change the CPT code; both are captured under 24575.
The 90-day global period applies. All routine post-op visits, hardware checks, cast/splint changes, and wound care through day 90 are bundled. Bill unrelated E/M services with modifier 24 and same-day separately identifiable E/M services with modifier 25. If a concomitant elbow dislocation is reduced at the same session, review NCCI edits before appending a bypass modifier.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 9.47 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.39 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.94 |
| Total RVU | 20.8 |
| Medicare national rate | $694.74 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $694.74 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $8,621.29 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24575 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- ICD-10 laterality mismatch — diagnosis code does not specify the same side (medial vs. lateral, left vs. right) documented in the operative report.
- Upcoding flag when 24575 is billed for a condylar fracture better described by 24579 — payers and auditors distinguish epicondylar from condylar anatomy, and conflating the two draws downcoding or denial.
- Global period violations — post-op E/M visits billed without modifier 24 when the visit is unrelated, or with modifier 24 when the visit is actually related to the fracture repair.
- Missing internal fixation documentation when an implant code (e.g., a hardware supply code) is billed alongside 24575 but the operative note does not confirm fixation was placed.
- Same-day E/M billed without modifier 25 when a separate decision-for-surgery visit occurred on the day of the procedure.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Does 24575 cover both medial and lateral epicondyle fractures?
02When should I use 24579 instead of 24575?
03Can I bill 24575 if no internal fixation was used?
04What modifiers apply when treating both elbows in the same session?
05How does the 90-day global affect post-op ulnar nerve complications?
06Is fluoroscopy separately billable with 24575?
07What ICD-10 codes pair with 24575?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02abos.orghttps://www.abos.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/sports-cpt-updated.pdf
- 03vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2024/code/24575/info
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 05cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 06aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/24575
- 07findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/24575-cpt-code.html
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the fracture location (medial vs. lateral epicondyle, left vs. right), confirms the approach as open with direct incision, records whether internal fixation was placed and the implant type, and flags ulnar nerve assessment for medial epicondyle cases. That documentation chain prevents laterality-mismatch denials and audit flags from operatives notes that omit approach or fixation detail.
See how Mira captures CPT 24575 documentation