Open treatment of a distal humeral fracture that extends into the intercondylar region, requiring fixation of both the supracondylar and intraarticular components.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $953.60
- Total RVUs
- 28.55
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Fracture pattern must be explicitly documented as having intercondylar extension — 'T-type,' 'Y-type,' or 'bicolumnar' are acceptable descriptors; 'distal humerus fracture' alone is insufficient.
- Operative note must identify the surgical approach by name (e.g., olecranon osteotomy, triceps-reflecting, paratricipital) — notes that say 'standard posterior approach' are audit flags.
- Fixation construct must be described in detail, including implant type, configuration (dual-column plating, crossed screws, etc.), and anatomic placement.
- Ulnar nerve handling must be documented — whether identified only, released, or formally transposed — to support or refute separate billing of 64718.
- Intraoperative fluoroscopy findings should be recorded if used for fracture reduction verification; fluoroscopy is bundled into 24546 and cannot be billed separately.
- Pre-op imaging (CT preferred for comminuted patterns) should be referenced in the operative note to establish fracture classification and surgical planning rationale.
- Laterality must be specified (left or right) for proper modifier assignment.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 24546 covers open reduction and internal fixation of a distal humeral fracture with intercondylar extension — the classic 'T' or 'Y' pattern fracture that splits the condyles apart while also breaking the shaft-to-condyle junction. This is a technically demanding procedure: the surgeon must reconstruct the articular surface, reduce the intercondylar split, and stabilize the supracondylar component, typically with dual-column plating. The ulnar nerve is routinely identified and often transposed during exposure, which is a key bundling consideration.
This code differs from 24545 specifically because of the intercondylar extension. If the fracture is purely supracondylar or transcondylar without articular involvement, 24545 applies. Coding 24546 for a fracture that lacks documented intraarticular extension is a common audit target. The 90-day global period covers all routine post-op care through day 90; any unrelated E/M service in that window needs modifier 24.
Ulnar nerve transposition (64718) is frequently performed alongside 24546 but is considered bundled under NCCI edits because ulnar nerve management is inherent to the surgical approach. Billing 64718 separately triggers CCI edit conflicts unless documentation clearly supports a distinct, separately reportable nerve procedure — and even then, payer acceptance varies. Confirm with your MAC before appending modifier 59 or XS.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 14.54 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.01 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3 |
| Total RVU | 28.55 |
| Medicare national rate | $953.60 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $953.60 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $9,148.76 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24546 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Upcoding denial when operative note documents only a supracondylar fracture pattern without confirming intercondylar articular involvement — 24545 would be correct in that scenario.
- NCCI bundling denial when 64718 (ulnar nerve transposition) is billed alongside 24546 without a modifier and without documentation supporting a separately distinct nerve procedure.
- Global period denial for post-op E/M services billed without modifier 24 when the visit is routine fracture follow-up within the 90-day window.
- Laterality error denial when LT or RT modifier is missing or mismatched with the operative report.
- Medical necessity denial when pre-authorization was obtained for a closed treatment code and the procedure was subsequently performed open without updated authorization.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What separates 24546 from 24545?
02Can I bill 64718 for ulnar nerve transposition performed during 24546?
03What modifier applies if I operate on the wrong side by documentation error — or need to bill a bilateral case?
04A co-surgeon assists with the reconstruction. How do I bill that?
05The fracture was more complex than typical — significant comminution required extra time and implants. Can I use modifier 22?
06What ICD-10 codes pair with 24546?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-13.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/24546
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/coding-and-reimbursement/
- 06ams.aaos.orghttps://ams.aaos.org/Online-Store/Product-Detail?id=54670860-57C1-EF11-B8E8-6045BD03FF0D
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures fracture pattern classification (intercondylar extension, T-type, Y-type, bicolumnar), surgical approach by name, fixation construct details, and ulnar nerve management from dictation. This prevents the most common 24546 audit trigger — operative notes that don't explicitly confirm intraarticular extension — and flags when ulnar nerve transposition language could inadvertently support a bundled 64718 claim.
See how Mira captures CPT 24546 documentation