Closed treatment of a humeral shaft fracture without manipulation — no incision, no fracture reduction performed.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $415.17
- Total RVUs
- 12.43
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Confirm fracture location in the humeral shaft — not the proximal humerus, distal humerus, or epiphyseal region, which map to different codes.
- State explicitly that no manipulation was performed and no incision was made.
- Document immobilization method used: splint, sling, coaptation splint, or functional brace, including application details.
- Record imaging reviewed (X-ray series, views, findings) and fracture displacement status at time of presentation.
- Note neurovascular exam findings — radial nerve integrity is particularly relevant for humeral shaft fractures.
- Document the mechanism of injury and clinical rationale for conservative management without manipulation.
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 24500 covers closed (non-operative) management of a humeral shaft fracture where the treating physician neither opens the skin nor manually reduces the fracture. The visit typically includes clinical assessment, imaging review, and application of a splint, sling, or functional brace. Because no manipulation is performed, this code sits below 24505, which covers closed treatment with manipulation.
The 90-day global period begins on the date of service. That window includes all routine follow-up visits, splint or brace adjustments, and standard wound or soft-tissue checks related to the fracture. Any E/M service unrelated to the fracture during that 90-day window requires modifier 24. A new, unrelated procedure by the same physician needs modifier 79; an unplanned return to the procedure room for a related complication requires modifier 78.
Side-specific modifiers LT and RT apply when laterality is relevant to payer adjudication. If the clinical complexity substantially exceeds the typical presentation — for example, a pathologic fracture with significant comorbidities requiring extended decision-making — modifier 22 is available, but the operative or clinical note must explicitly document the additional work and time. Per CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026, HOPD and ASC payment rates differ; see the Site of Service comparison table on this page.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 3.32 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.41 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.7 |
| Total RVU | 12.43 |
| Medicare national rate | $415.17 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $415.17 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $135.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24500 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Fracture site not specified — payer cannot confirm humeral shaft versus proximal or distal humerus codes.
- No documentation that manipulation was absent, leaving ambiguity about whether 24505 was the appropriate code.
- E/M billed same-day without modifier 25, or billed during the 90-day global period without modifier 24.
- Missing laterality modifier (LT/RT) required by specific payers, triggering technical denial.
- ICD-10 diagnosis code does not match humeral shaft fracture, causing CPT-to-diagnosis mismatch rejection.
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 24500 and 24505?
02Can I bill an E/M visit on the same day as 24500?
03What happens if the patient needs manipulation at a follow-up visit during the global period?
04Is a pathologic humeral shaft fracture billed the same way?
05Does 24500 include the initial casting or splinting?
06Should I use modifier 50 for a bilateral humeral shaft fracture?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-medicaid-ncci-chapter-4-policy-manual.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/24500
- 04mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/24500
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
- 06vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2021/code/24500/info
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures fracture location (humeral shaft), confirmation that no manipulation was performed, immobilization type applied, neurovascular exam findings including radial nerve status, and imaging findings from dictation. This prevents the two most common audit flags: ambiguous fracture site documentation and missing confirmation of the no-manipulation criterion that distinguishes 24500 from 24505.
See how Mira captures CPT 24500 documentation