Surgical removal of a foreign body lodged deep in the upper arm or elbow, requiring dissection through the fascia into subfascial or intramuscular tissue.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $667.35
- Total RVUs
- 19.98
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Elbow
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Explicitly state the depth of the foreign body as subfascial or intramuscular — 'deep' alone is insufficient without anatomic detail
- Describe the incision approach, layers entered, and how the foreign body was identified and retrieved
- Record the nature, size, and type of foreign body removed (e.g., metal fragment, glass, organic material)
- Document any imaging or localization technique used intraoperatively (fluoroscopy, ultrasound, probe)
- Note laterality (left or right upper arm/elbow) in the operative report and on the claim
- If modifier 22 is appended, document operative time and specific factors that increased procedural complexity
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 24201 covers open removal of a foreign body situated deep to the fascia — subfascial or intramuscular — in the upper arm or elbow region. The depth distinction is what separates this code from 24200: if the object is subcutaneous and above the fascia, 24200 applies. Once the surgeon must cut through fascia and work within or beneath the muscle layer, 24201 is correct. The operative note must make that depth explicit to survive audit.
The 90-day global period means routine post-op visits, wound checks, and dressing changes through day 90 are bundled — don't bill E/M services for those encounters without modifier 24. Wound closure is included in the global package; billing a separate repair code on the same date will trigger an NCCI edit. If imaging guidance (fluoroscopy, ultrasound) was used to locate the foreign body, confirm payer policy on whether that guidance can be reported separately — NCCI bundles many guidance codes into surgical procedures unless a distinct anatomic site or separate encounter applies.
Side laterality matters: append LT or RT to identify which arm. If bilateral foreign body removal is performed in the same session (uncommon but possible), modifier 50 is used. Modifier 22 is available when the procedure involved unusually extensive exploration — document operative time, complexity, and any complicating factors explicitly to support it.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 4.58 |
| Practice expense RVU | 14.41 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.99 |
| Total RVU | 19.98 |
| Medicare national rate | $667.35 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $667.35 |
HOPD (APC 5073) Hospital outpatient department | $2,967.63 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,248.36 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 24201 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Depth not documented — payer downcodes to 24200 (subcutaneous) when operative note doesn't confirm subfascial or intramuscular dissection
- Separate wound closure code billed same-day — closure is bundled into 24201 and triggers an NCCI edit
- Missing laterality modifier — some payers require LT or RT for unilateral extremity procedures
- Modifier 22 submitted without supporting documentation of increased operative time or complexity
- E/M visit billed during the 90-day global period without modifier 24, resulting in denial as a bundled service
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What separates 24201 from 24200?
02Is wound closure separately billable with 24201?
03Can imaging guidance be billed alongside 24201?
04What modifier applies if the patient returns to the OR during the 90-day global because the foreign body wasn't fully retrieved?
05When is modifier 22 justified for 24201?
06Does 24201 carry a global period, and what does that cover?
07How do you bill if foreign bodies are removed from both arms in the same session?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04jucm.comhttps://www.jucm.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2007-2139-40-Coding.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/quality/resident-guide-to-coding-and-practice-management/coding-reimbursement-for-residents/coding-tools-for-residents/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the depth of dissection (subfascial vs. intramuscular), the layers traversed, the localization method used, and a description of the foreign body retrieved — the exact details auditors check when distinguishing 24201 from the lower-valued 24200. That prevents downcoding denials before the claim ever leaves the practice.
See how Mira captures CPT 24201 documentation