Prophylactic reinforcement of the clavicle using internal fixation hardware or bone cement to prevent pathological fracture.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $800.62
- Total RVUs
- 23.97
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Shoulder
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Preoperative imaging (X-ray, CT, or MRI) documenting the structural defect, lesion, or tumor involvement in the clavicle
- Operative note specifying the type and brand of fixation hardware used (nail, plate, screws) and/or use of methylmethacrylate bone cement
- Pathology or oncology records if the indication is metastatic disease or primary bone tumor — justifies medical necessity for prophylactic fixation
- Explicit statement in the op note that the procedure was prophylactic (fracture not yet present) and why structural failure was imminent without intervention
- Laterality documented — left or right clavicle — to support LT or RT modifier use
- If modifier 22 is appended, a separate written justification with time and complexity detail beyond the standard procedure
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 23490 covers open surgical reinforcement of the clavicle — the collarbone — typically performed when the bone is at risk of pathological fracture due to metastatic disease, primary bone tumor, cyst, or other structural compromise. The surgeon stabilizes the weakened segment using fixation implants such as intramedullary nails, plates, or screws. Bone cement (methylmethacrylate) may also be packed into the defect for additional structural support. This is a prophylactic procedure: the fracture has not yet occurred, but the bone cannot sustain normal loads without intervention.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op care — wound checks, implant monitoring visits, dressing changes — is bundled through day 90. Any visit for an unrelated problem during that window needs modifier 24 on the E/M. If a complication requires a return to the OR for a related procedure, bill the return with modifier 78. An unrelated surgical problem addressed in a separate OR visit during the global gets modifier 79.
Don't confuse 23490 with neighboring codes. Code 23480 and 23485 are osteotomies of the clavicle — cutting and repositioning, not reinforcing. Code 23491 is the companion code for prophylactic reinforcement of the proximal humerus or scapula, not the clavicle. Billing 23490 when the operative note describes a clavicle osteotomy, or vice versa, is one of the more common upcoding flags on audit.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 11.86 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.58 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.53 |
| Total RVU | 23.97 |
| Medicare national rate | $800.62 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $800.62 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 23490 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Medical necessity not established — payer requires documented imaging and oncology or orthopedic rationale showing impending fracture risk before authorizing prophylactic fixation
- Wrong code selected — operative note actually describes osteotomy or fracture fixation, which maps to 23480, 23485, or 23515, not prophylactic reinforcement
- Missing laterality modifier — many payers and state Medicaid programs require LT or RT on shoulder procedure claims and reject without it
- Global period conflict — post-op visit billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global, triggering automatic bundling denial
- Authorization gap — given the HOPD and ASC payment levels, most payers require prior authorization; missing or mismatched auth number is a top denial driver
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 23490 and 23485?
02When is 23491 billed instead of, or alongside, 23490?
03Does 23490 require prior authorization?
04What modifier covers a post-op E/M visit during the 90-day global for an unrelated problem?
05Can 23490 be performed in an ASC setting?
06How should fluoroscopy used during clavicle reinforcement be billed?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/23490
- 05health.ny.govhttps://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/rates/methodology/amb_surg_proc_codes.htm
- 06dam.assets.ohio.govhttps://dam.assets.ohio.gov/image/upload/medicaid.ohio.gov/Providers/FeeScheduleRates/OutpatientHospital/Covered_List_OPH_ASC_Effective_7.1.2025.pdf
- 07manuals.health.milhttps://manuals.health.mil/DisplayManualPdfFile/2003-12-19/AsOf/TR02/C9ADA.PDF
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific indication (metastatic lesion, bone cyst, tumor involvement), the fixation construct used (nail, plate, screws, methylmethacrylate), laterality, and the surgeon's explicit statement that the procedure was performed prophylactically prior to fracture. This prevents the most common audit flag — an op note that describes hardware placement without distinguishing prophylactic reinforcement from fracture fixation, which can trigger a code-level downgrade to 23515 or 23480 on review.
See how Mira captures CPT 23490 documentation