Revision of a prior total shoulder arthroplasty involving replacement or repair of either the humeral or glenoid component, with allograft use when required.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,440.25
- Total RVUs
- 43.12
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Shoulder
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify which component was revised: humeral or glenoid — not both (use 23474 if both revised)
- Document the indication for revision: loosening, wear, infection, instability, or mechanical failure with imaging correlation
- State whether allograft was used, including graft source and how it was applied
- Describe the condition of the explanted component and bone stock at time of surgery
- Record surgical approach by name and any intraoperative findings that increased complexity (supports modifier 22 if applicable)
- Include pre-operative imaging reports confirming implant failure or pathology to establish medical necessity
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
23473 covers single-component revision of a failed or problematic total shoulder arthroplasty — either the humeral stem/head or the glenoid — including allograft augmentation when bone loss demands it. Use this code when only one component is being revised. If both the humeral and glenoid components are revised in the same session, step up to 23474.
Indications driving revision include component loosening, polyethylene wear, periprosthetic infection, instability, mechanical failure, or malpositioning identified on imaging. The operative note must clearly state which component was revised, the condition of the explanted hardware, and whether allograft was used. Vague language like 'shoulder revision performed' is an audit flag and a denial trigger.
This code carries a 90-day global period. All routine post-op visits, wound checks, and related services through day 90 are bundled. Bill unrelated same-period E/M visits with modifier 24. Do not separately report 23334 or 23335 (prosthesis removal) alongside 23473 — removal of the failed component is inherent to the revision and CMS NCCI policy prohibits unbundling it.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 24.38 |
| Practice expense RVU | 13.85 |
| Malpractice RVU | 4.89 |
| Total RVU | 43.12 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,440.25 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,440.25 |
HOPD (APC 5115) Hospital outpatient department | $13,116.76 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $9,390.23 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 23473 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Medical necessity not established — missing imaging or clinical documentation showing implant failure or pathology
- 23334 or 23335 billed separately for prosthesis removal, which is bundled into 23473 per NCCI policy
- 23473 billed when both components were revised — should be 23474, triggering a code mismatch denial
- Operative note fails to specify which component (humeral vs. glenoid) was revised, leaving payer unable to validate code selection
- Routine post-op E/M visits billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global period
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01When do I use 23473 vs. 23474?
02Can I separately bill 23334 or 23335 for removing the old implant during a 23473 revision?
03Is allograft use required to bill 23473?
04What modifier applies if the revision was substantially more complex than typical?
05What is the global period for 23473 and what does it include?
06Can 23473 be performed in an ASC setting?
07Which ICD-10-CM codes are most commonly paired with 23473?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/coding-newsletters/my-orthopedic-coding-alert/orthopedic-coding-understand-the-complexities-of-shoulder-arthroplasty-coding-179096-article
- 04zimmerbiomet.comhttps://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zb-corporate/en/support/coding-guides/0778.9-US-en%20Shoulder%20Coding%20Reference%20Guide%20(1).pdf
- 05aetna.comhttps://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/800_899/0837.html
- 06findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/23473-cpt-code.html
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the revised component (humeral or glenoid), the failure mode documented intraoperatively, allograft use with source, bone stock quality, and surgical approach from the surgeon's dictation. This prevents the most common denial pattern for 23473: an operative note that says 'revision shoulder arthroplasty' without specifying which component — leaving coders guessing and payers rejecting.
See how Mira captures CPT 23473 documentation