Open arthrotomy of the glenohumeral joint with synovectomy — incision into the shoulder joint to excise inflamed synovial tissue, with or without biopsy.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $605.22
- Total RVUs
- 18.12
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Shoulder
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Diagnosis driving the synovectomy — specify condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, PVNS, inflammatory arthritis) with supporting clinical history
- Failed prior treatment documented — conservative measures, injections, or arthroscopic attempts that justify open approach
- Operative note naming the surgical approach (e.g., deltopectoral, anterosuperior) — notes that say 'standard approach' are audit flags
- Extent of synovial resection described — partial vs. complete synovectomy, specific compartments addressed
- Biopsy documentation if tissue was sent to pathology — specimen label, laterality, and pathology order must match the operative note
- Laterality clearly stated in both the operative note and the claim — LT or RT required for shoulder procedures
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 23105 describes an open surgical procedure in which the glenohumeral joint is entered through a direct incision, the synovium is inspected, and inflamed or diseased synovial tissue is excised. The goal is pain relief and restoration of motion in patients where synovial pathology — such as that seen in rheumatoid arthritis, pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), or persistent inflammatory arthritis — has failed conservative or arthroscopic management. A tissue biopsy may be taken during the same session.
This is an open procedure, not arthroscopic. If synovectomy is performed arthroscopically at the shoulder, report 29823 instead. 23105 carries a 90-day global period, meaning all routine post-op care through day 90 is bundled. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24; a significant, separately identifiable E/M on the day of surgery requires modifier 25.
The procedure is performed almost exclusively by orthopedic surgeons. Site of service matters significantly here — HOPD and ASC payments differ substantially. See the Site of Service comparison table on this page for current 2026 rates.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 8.27 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.13 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.72 |
| Total RVU | 18.12 |
| Medicare national rate | $605.22 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $605.22 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 23105 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing laterality modifier — LT or RT required; claims without one are routinely rejected by Medicare and most commercial payers
- Bundling conflict when 23105 is billed same-day with arthroscopic shoulder codes — payers will question why both open and scope procedures were performed
- Lack of medical necessity documentation — synovectomy requires evidence of failed conservative treatment; vague diagnoses like 'shoulder pain' without supporting pathology will trigger denial
- Global period violations — post-op E/M visits billed without modifier 24 during the 90-day global are denied as already bundled
- Upcoding to modifier 22 without adequate documentation — increased complexity claims require the operative note to quantify why work exceeded the typical case
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 23105 and CPT 29823?
02Does 23105 require a laterality modifier?
03What global period applies to 23105?
04Can modifier 22 be used with 23105?
05Is a biopsy separately billable when performed during 23105?
06When would modifier 58 apply to 23105?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/23105
- 02mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/23105
- 03findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/23105-cpt-code.html
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/medicare-ncci-policy-manual-2024-chapter-4.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-ncci-medicaid-policy-manual.pdf
- 06CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgical approach by name, the extent of synovial resection (partial vs. complete), compartments entered, biopsy status, and laterality directly from the surgeon's dictation. This prevents the two most common audit flags for 23105: operative notes that omit approach terminology and missing laterality documentation that triggers automatic claim rejection.
See how Mira captures CPT 23105 documentation