Radical resection of a soft tissue tumor (e.g., sarcoma) of the abdominal wall measuring less than 5 cm, including excision of surrounding tissue and any involved anatomical structures beyond the tumor margin.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $985.33
- Total RVUs
- 29.5
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- General
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Tumor size recorded as diameter plus required margins — not tumor alone — confirming less than 5 cm threshold for 22904 vs. 22905
- Explicit documentation that resection was radical in nature, extending beyond tumor margins to surrounding tissue or involved anatomical structures
- Pathology or clinical diagnosis supporting malignant or aggressive tumor type (e.g., sarcoma) justifying radical rather than simple excision approach
- Operative note naming specific structures excised beyond the tumor, including fascial layers, muscle, or adjacent tissue — avoid generic 'tumor removed with margins'
- If modifier 22 applied, a separate attestation in the operative note quantifying the increased complexity, time, or effort beyond the typical procedure
- Imaging or pre-operative workup referenced in the record to support the extent of resection and confirm abdominal wall location
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 22904 covers radical resection of a malignant soft tissue tumor — most commonly sarcoma — arising from the abdominal wall, where the tumor plus margins measure less than 5 cm. Unlike simple excision codes (22900, 22902), radical resection extends beyond the tumor itself to include surrounding tissue and any anatomical structures suspected of involvement. That distinction drives both the higher RVU value and the documentation burden: operative notes must establish why radical — not simple — resection was required.
The 90-day global period applies. Routine post-op visits, wound checks, and dressing changes through day 90 are bundled. Unrelated E/M visits in that window require modifier 24; a separately identifiable same-day E/M needs modifier 25 on the pre-op encounter. If a significantly more complex resection occurs — extensive neurovascular dissection, involvement of adjacent structures requiring reconstruction — modifier 22 with detailed supporting documentation can justify additional reimbursement.
Size threshold is the primary code-selection fork: 22904 is less than 5 cm; 22905 covers 5 cm or greater. Measure tumor diameter plus required margins, not tumor alone. Coding the wrong size tier is one of the most common audit flags for this code family. When the procedure shifts intraoperatively from planned simple excision to radical resection, modifier 22 or an upgrade to the correct radical resection code with a clear operative note is required.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 16.27 |
| Practice expense RVU | 9.45 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.78 |
| Total RVU | 29.5 |
| Medicare national rate | $985.33 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $985.33 |
HOPD (APC 5073) Hospital outpatient department | $2,967.63 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,248.36 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 22904 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Size threshold mismatch: tumor measured without margins, placing the case incorrectly under 22904 when 22905 applies — or vice versa
- Radical resection not supported: operative note describes a standard excision with clear margins but coder billed 22904 instead of 22900 or 22902
- Missing or inadequate pathology correlation: payer unable to confirm malignant or sarcoma-type diagnosis required to justify radical resection code
- Unbundling conflict: separately billed reconstruction or closure codes that are considered integral to the radical resection by payer policy
- Global period violation: post-op E/M billed without modifier 24 within the 90-day global window
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What separates 22904 from 22900 — when do I use radical resection vs. simple excision?
02How is the 5 cm threshold measured for 22904 vs. 22905?
03Can 22904 be billed with reconstruction codes on the same date?
04Does the 90-day global period affect how I bill post-op oncology follow-up?
05When is modifier 22 appropriate with 22904?
06Is 22904 used only for sarcoma, or can it cover other abdominal wall tumors?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/22904
- 03payerprice.comhttps://payerprice.com/rates/22904-CPT-fee-schedule
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/ProviderManuals/Physician/PDFS/Physician_Procedure_Codes_Sect5_2021-4.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/02-chapter2-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 06cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures tumor location (abdominal wall), measured diameter with margins, the extent of radical resection beyond tumor boundaries, specific structures excised, and the pathologic basis for malignant diagnosis — all from dictation. This prevents the most common 22904 audit trigger: an operative note that documents a wide local excision but fails to establish why radical resection, rather than simple excision, was medically necessary.
See how Mira captures CPT 22904 documentation