Surgical removal of a previously placed anterior spinal instrumentation system (plate, rod, or screw construct) from the front of the vertebral column.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,050.79
- Total RVUs
- 31.46
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify the spinal approach as anterior and identify the exact vertebral levels involved
- Document the original implant type (plate, rod, screw, cage anchor) and the reason for removal (infection, failure, pain, pseudarthrosis)
- State whether instrumentation was reinserted and, if so, whether it was at the same or a different level — this drives the reinsertion vs. removal code selection
- Include intraoperative findings describing hardware condition (e.g., broken screw, loose plate, reactive tissue) to support medical necessity
- Confirm that fluoroscopy, if used, is documented as intraoperative guidance integral to the procedure and not billed separately
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 22855 covers the operative removal of anterior spinal instrumentation — plates, rods, screws, or similar hardware — that was originally placed from an anterior surgical approach. Common indications include hardware failure, infection, pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment pathology, or persistent pain attributable to the implant. The 90-day global period means any routine follow-up after this removal is bundled; billing an E/M during that window requires modifier 24 for unrelated visits or modifier 79 for unrelated surgical procedures in a separate return trip to the OR.
A critical distinction governs same-day reinsertion: if hardware is removed and reinserted at the same spinal level, report 22849 (reinsertion) — not 22855. If removal is at one level and new instrumentation placed at a non-overlapping level, code both the removal (22855) and the new instrumentation code separately. Per AANS guidance and NCCI policy, conflating these scenarios is a frequent unbundling or under-coding error.
NCCI bundles exploration of the surgical field (22830) into 22855 — do not report 22830 separately. Fluoroscopy used intraoperatively is also integral. With 296 known NCCI code pairs attached to 22855, pre-claim scrubbing against the NCCI PTP lookup is essential before submission.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 15.46 |
| Practice expense RVU | 11.1 |
| Malpractice RVU | 4.9 |
| Total RVU | 31.46 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,050.79 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,050.79 |
HOPD (APC 5114) Hospital outpatient department | $7,413.38 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,695.53 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 22855 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Billing 22855 alongside 22849 when removal and reinsertion occurred at the same spinal level — only 22849 is reportable in that scenario
- Unbundling 22830 (exploration) as a separate charge when it is included in the 22855 surgical package per NCCI
- Missing medical necessity documentation — payers require explicit indication for removal (hardware failure, infection, etc.) in the operative note
- Incorrect modifier use during the 90-day global period — E/M visits without modifier 24, or unrelated OR returns without modifier 79, will deny
- Separately billing intraoperative fluoroscopy guidance, which is integral to the procedure and not independently payable
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01When do I use 22855 versus 22849?
02Can I bill 22830 (exploration) with 22855?
03Is modifier 59 or XS needed when billing 22855 with another spinal procedure on the same date?
04What does the 90-day global period cover for 22855?
05Can 22855 be billed with a new anterior instrumentation code if hardware is removed and replaced at a different level?
06Is intraoperative fluoroscopy separately billable with 22855?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 04cgsmedicare.comhttps://www.cgsmedicare.com/medicare_dynamic/j15/partb/ptpb/ptp.aspx
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/22855
- 06billrazor.comhttps://billrazor.com/bundling/22855-removal-anterior-instrmj
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the anterior surgical approach, specific vertebral levels addressed, implant type removed, intraoperative findings, and the clinical indication for removal directly from dictation. It also flags whether any reinsertion occurred and at which level — the detail that determines whether 22855 or 22849 is the correct code. That prevents the same-level reinsertion miscoding that is one of the most common audit triggers for this procedure.
See how Mira captures CPT 22855 documentation