Anterior spinal arthrodesis for deformity correction spanning 4 to 7 vertebral segments, including minimal discectomy to prepare each interspace.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,795.97
- Total RVUs
- 53.77
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Specify the exact vertebral levels fused (e.g., T6–T12) — range must fall within 4 to 7 segments
- Confirm anterior approach and document the surgical access technique by name (thoracotomy, retroperitoneal, transperitoneal, VATS, etc.)
- Record that interspace preparation (minimal discectomy) was performed at each level
- State the primary deformity diagnosis (scoliosis, kyphosis, flatback, etc.) with corresponding ICD-10 code
- If co-surgeon is involved, each surgeon's operative note must document their distinct role and the work they personally performed
- If staging a subsequent procedure, document intent for staged surgery in the initial operative note to support modifier 58
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 22810 covers anterior interbody fusion performed to correct spinal deformity — scoliosis, kyphosis, or similar conditions — across 4 to 7 vertebral segments. The work includes the minimal discectomy required to prepare each interspace before graft or implant placement. This is a high-intensity procedure carrying a 90-day global period and among the highest RVU values in the spine surgery family.
The anterior approach frequently involves a second surgeon — a general or vascular surgeon — to perform the approach and closure. When two surgeons each perform a distinct portion of the procedure, both bill 22810 with modifier 62. The co-surgeon billing only instrumentation codes is wrong; each surgeon reports only the work they personally performed. Both surgeons' operative notes must independently document their distinct roles.
Staged deformity correction is common. If a posterior procedure is planned at a separate session, document that intent in the initial operative note and use modifier 58 on the subsequent claim — this resets the global period clock. For an unplanned return to the OR for a related complication, use modifier 78. For an unrelated procedure during the global, use modifier 79.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 30.71 |
| Practice expense RVU | 16.51 |
| Malpractice RVU | 6.55 |
| Total RVU | 53.77 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,795.97 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,795.97 |
HOPD (APC 5116) Hospital outpatient department | $17,913.59 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $13,933.19 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 22810 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Segment count mismatch between operative note and claim — 22808 covers 2–3 segments, 22810 covers 4–7; using the wrong code triggers automatic denial
- Co-surgeon claims denied when both surgeons submit identical operative notes without distinct role documentation
- Instrumentation codes denied when billed by the co-surgeon (approach/closure surgeon) rather than the primary spine surgeon
- Claim denied for services rendered in the global period without appropriate modifier (24, 58, 78, or 79) to establish separate billable event
- Missing or vague deformity diagnosis — payers require a documented spinal deformity indication, not just 'spinal stenosis' or 'back pain'
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between 22808 and 22810?
02How does modifier 62 work when a general surgeon performs the approach?
03If a posterior fusion is planned as a second stage, how do I bill the follow-up procedure during the global period?
04Is modifier 22 ever appropriate for 22810?
05Can 22810 be billed with posterior fusion codes on the same date?
06What global period applies to 22810 and what does it cover?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-policy-manual
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/22810
- 06mdclarity.comhttps://www.mdclarity.com/cpt-code/22810
- 07aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the exact vertebral levels treated, the anterior approach technique, confirmation of interspace preparation at each level, and the deformity diagnosis from dictation. For co-surgeon cases, it flags whether distinct role language is present in each surgeon's note. This prevents the two most common denials for 22810: segment count mismatches that trigger the wrong code, and co-surgeon rejections caused by duplicate or undifferentiated operative documentation.
See how Mira captures CPT 22810 documentation