Add-on code for each additional interspace treated by posterior or posterolateral arthrodesis beyond the first level billed with a primary fusion code.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $349.37
- Total RVUs
- 10.46
- Global, days
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify each interspace treated by level designation (e.g., L4-L5, L5-S1) in the operative note
- Name the surgical technique at each level (posterior, posterolateral, or lateral transverse process)
- Document all bone grafts used — type (autograft, allograft), harvest site, and add-on graft codes billed
- Record trade names of all instrumentation and implants placed to support separately billed hardware codes
- Identify the primary arthrodesis code (22600, 22610, 22612, 22630, or 22633) that 22614 accompanies
- Document medical necessity for each additional level fused, including imaging findings and clinical rationale
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
22614 is an add-on code (AOC) billed once per additional interspace when a posterior, posterolateral, or lateral transverse process arthrodesis extends beyond the single level captured by the primary procedure. It carries a ZZZ global period, meaning it inherits the global period of the primary code it accompanies — never reported alone. Per the CMS NCCI Policy Manual 2026, 22614 may only be reported alongside primary codes 22600, 22610, 22612, 22630, or 22633. Do not append modifier 51 to this add-on code.
For multilevel constructs within the same spinal region through the same incision, report the primary code for the first interspace and 22614 for each additional interspace. If the construct spans two spinal regions through the same incision, the same rule applies — one primary, 22614 for each additional level. When two separate skin incisions are used across different spinal regions, the second region may carry its own primary code. Bone graft and instrumentation codes are separately reportable and must be documented to support medical necessity.
Two-surgeon (modifier 62) reporting is applicable when both surgeons act as co-primary surgeons for the entire construct. If a PA, NP, or CNS assists, append modifier AS to the assistant's claim. Document implant trade names, graft source, and the specific technique at each interspace — audit reviewers target multilevel fusion claims for level-count mismatches between the operative note and the claim.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 6.27 |
| Practice expense RVU | 2.11 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.08 |
| Total RVU | 10.46 |
| Medicare national rate | $349.37 |
| Global period | days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $349.37 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 22614 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Reported without a valid primary code — 22614 cannot stand alone and has no recognized primary pairing outside 22600, 22610, 22612, 22630, or 22633
- Level count on the claim exceeds the number of interspaces documented in the operative report
- Modifier 51 appended in error — add-on codes are exempt from multiple-procedure reduction and modifier 51 triggers incorrect payment logic
- Primary code billed is not an approved pairing per NCCI (e.g., appended to 22633 when 22634 is the correct additional-level AOC for combined posterior-interbody)
- Missing bone graft documentation — payers may deny the fusion construct entirely if graft codes lack supporting operative detail
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Which primary codes can be billed with 22614?
02Should modifier 51 be appended to 22614?
03How many times can 22614 be reported on a single claim?
04Can 22614 be used when the fusion spans two different spinal regions?
05Is modifier 62 allowed on 22614?
06Does 22614 require a separate bone graft code?
07What global period applies to 22614?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/chapter4cptcodes20000-29999final11.pdf
- 04healthcareinspiredllc.comhttps://healthcareinspiredllc.com/fusion-confusion-cpt-coding-made-simple-for-spinal-fusions/
- 05nerves.memberclicks.nethttps://nerves.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/2023-Annual-Meeting/2023-NERVES-%28TR%29-041323-Fnl.pdf
- 06aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/22614
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the specific interspace label (e.g., L4-L5, L5-S1), the technique name, graft type and harvest site, implant trade names, and the primary procedure code for each operative dictation involving multilevel posterior arthrodesis. That level-by-level capture prevents the most common audit flag on 22614 claims: a mismatch between the number of add-on units billed and the number of additional interspaces documented in the operative note.
See how Mira captures CPT 22614 documentation