Closed treatment of a vertebral fracture without manipulation — no reduction performed, typically managed with bracing or casting.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $341.36
- Total RVUs
- 10.22
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Spine
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify the vertebral level(s) affected (e.g., L1, T12) — 'thoracic spine' alone is insufficient for audit purposes
- Confirm no manipulation or reduction was performed — document the treatment decision explicitly
- Document the conservative treatment plan prescribed, including type of orthosis (e.g., TLSO) and rationale
- Record neurologic status at the time of evaluation to support medical necessity
- If an E/M is billed same-day with modifier 25, document the distinct clinical issue addressed beyond the fracture management decision
- Imaging findings (X-ray, CT, or MRI) confirming fracture diagnosis and stability should be referenced in the note
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 22310 covers closed treatment of a spinal vertebral fracture where no manipulation or reduction is performed. The treating physician manages the fracture conservatively — typically by prescribing and overseeing orthotics such as a TLSO brace — without any attempt to realign the fracture fragment. This code applies across cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels as long as no manipulative reduction occurs.
The 90-day global period means all routine follow-up related to the fracture, including office visits, brace checks, and wound care, is bundled into the single procedure payment through day 90. Billing a separate E/M during that window requires modifier 24 (unrelated condition) or modifier 25 (significant, separately identifiable service on the date of the procedure itself). A common audit flag is billing an E/M on the same date as 22310 without modifier 25 and clear documentation of a distinct, separately identifiable service.
Radiologic guidance is not included in the code descriptor, so imaging used to assess the fracture may be separately reportable — but confirm NCCI bundling rules before doing so. The physician ordering and supervising the conservative management (including the brace) can bill 22310 even if a separate technician applies the orthotic, provided the supervising physician documents their role in fracture management.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 3.36 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.07 |
| Malpractice RVU | 0.79 |
| Total RVU | 10.22 |
| Medicare national rate | $341.36 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $341.36 |
HOPD (APC 5111) Hospital outpatient department | $252.01 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $135.54 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 22310 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- E/M billed on the same date without modifier 25, triggering bundling denial under NCCI minor surgical procedure rules
- Fracture level or anatomic detail missing from documentation, causing medical necessity failure on audit
- 22310 billed during the 90-day global period of a prior spinal procedure without modifier 24 or 79 to establish a distinct, unrelated service
- Manipulation or reduction documented in the note, which points to 22315 instead — mismatched code-to-note content triggers downcoding or denial
- Missing documentation of physician involvement in fracture management when billing for brace oversight performed by ancillary staff
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Can I bill 22310 if my staff applies the TLSO brace rather than the physician?
02What is the difference between 22310 and 22315?
03Can I bill an E/M on the same day as 22310?
04What global period applies to 22310, and what does it cover?
05Does 22310 cover all spinal levels?
06Can 22310 be billed during the global period of a prior spinal fusion?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02bedrockbilling.comhttps://bedrockbilling.com/static/cci/22310
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral/list-cpt-hcpcs-codes
- 06aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/22310
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the vertebral level, fracture characterization, neurologic status, explicit statement that no manipulation was performed, and the prescribed orthosis type from the physician's dictation. That detail prevents the two most common 22310 audit failures: an underdocumented fracture level and a missing 'no manipulation' statement that auditors use to challenge whether 22315 should have been billed instead.
See how Mira captures CPT 22310 documentation