Surgical removal of a subfascial (e.g., intramuscular) soft tissue tumor of the back or flank measuring less than 5 cm at its greatest excised diameter including margins.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $627.27
- Total RVUs
- 18.78
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Confirm tumor location is subfascial (below the fascia, e.g., intramuscular) — not subcutaneous or cutaneous in origin
- Record greatest excised diameter of the tumor plus the required margin at time of excision, confirming the total is less than 5 cm
- Specify the anatomic site as back or flank; generic 'posterior trunk' is insufficient for audit defense
- Document the tissue depth reached during dissection to support subfascial classification over superficial codes
- Include pathology report correlating with the operative specimen to confirm non-cutaneous soft tissue origin
- If modifier 22 is appended, document specific factors increasing complexity — adhesions, neurovascular proximity, prior radiation — and estimate additional operative time
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21932 covers excision of a deep soft tissue tumor of the back or flank located below the fascia — think intramuscular lipomas, desmoids, or other subfascial masses — where the tumor plus the required excision margin measures less than 5 cm. Depth is the defining split: superficial tumors above the fascia go to 21930 (less than 3 cm) or 21931 (3 cm or greater); subfascial tumors under 5 cm land on 21932; subfascial tumors 5 cm or greater go to 21933. Size is measured at the time of excision as the greatest diameter of the tumor plus the narrowest margin needed for complete removal.
Code selection errors cluster around two mistakes: using the superficial skin-lesion codes (11400–11446) for what is actually a deep subfascial mass, and misclassifying cutaneous-origin lesions (sebaceous cysts, epidermal inclusion cysts) under musculoskeletal tumor codes. CPT guidelines are explicit — cutaneous-origin benign lesions belong in the 11400 series regardless of anatomic location. The operative note must establish subfascial depth and confirm the measured size to survive audit.
The 90-day global period applies. All routine follow-up through day 90 is bundled. A separate, unrelated E/M or procedure in that window requires modifier 24 or 79, respectively. If increased complexity — dense adhesions, proximity to neurovascular structures, prior radiation field — significantly extends intraoperative work, modifier 22 applies with supporting documentation quantifying the additional time and difficulty.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 9.57 |
| Practice expense RVU | 6.96 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.25 |
| Total RVU | 18.78 |
| Medicare national rate | $627.27 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $627.27 |
HOPD (APC 5073) Hospital outpatient department | $2,967.63 |
ASC (PI G2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,248.36 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21932 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Wrong code family: cutaneous-origin lesions (e.g., sebaceous or epidermal inclusion cysts) coded to 21932 instead of 11400–11446
- Size not documented: operative note lacks a measured greatest diameter plus margin, making the less-than-5-cm threshold unverifiable
- Depth not established: note describes the tumor as subcutaneous rather than subfascial, misaligning with the code descriptor
- Unbundling error: excision reported alongside separately billed wound closure or pathology services that are already included
- Global period conflict: a routine follow-up E/M billed within 90 days without modifier 24, triggering automatic denial
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01How is tumor size measured for 21932?
02Can I use 21932 for an intramuscular lipoma of the back?
03Should I use 21932 or 11406 for a large back lesion?
04What global period applies, and what's bundled in it?
05When does modifier 22 apply to 21932?
06Is 21932 billed differently in a hospital outpatient department versus an ASC?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02facs.orghttps://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/news-and-articles/bulletin/2021/10/reporting-excision-of-soft-tissue-tumor-codes/
- 03vsac.nlm.nih.govhttps://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/context/cs/codesystem/CPT/version/2018/code/21932/info
- 04bedrockbilling.comhttps://bedrockbilling.com/static/cci/21932
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/08-chapter8-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 06aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21932
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures tumor anatomic site (back vs. flank), tissue depth relative to the fascia (subfascial/intramuscular vs. subcutaneous), and the measured greatest diameter of the tumor plus excision margin at time of removal. It flags operative notes that describe the lesion as cutaneous in origin — routing those to the 11400 series instead — and alerts when no size measurement is recorded, the most common audit trigger for this code.
See how Mira captures CPT 21932 documentation