Open treatment of a nasomaxillary complex fracture with bone grafting
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $947.92
- Total RVUs
- 28.38
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Operative note must identify the fracture pattern and confirm open exposure of the nasomaxillary complex
- Graft type, source (autograft donor site, allograft, or synthetic), and placement location must be explicitly documented
- If autograft is harvested, document the donor site anatomy and harvest technique separately from the fracture repair narrative
- Imaging (CT preferred) confirming nasomaxillary fracture with displacement or bone loss should be in the record
- Document medical necessity for grafting — e.g., comminution, bone defect size, or inadequacy of primary fixation alone
- Record any fixation hardware used (plates, screws, wires) with size and placement detail
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 21348 covers open surgical repair of a nasomaxillary fracture that requires bone grafting as part of the reconstruction. The graft — autograft, allograft, or synthetic — is used to restore skeletal continuity or volume where comminution or bone loss makes primary fixation alone insufficient. The code is distinct from simpler nasomaxillary repair codes that do not involve grafting; if a graft is not harvested or placed, 21348 does not apply.
The 90-day global period means all routine post-op visits, wound checks, and splint or fixation adjustments are bundled through day 90. Unrelated E/M services in that window require modifier 24. A decision-for-surgery visit on the day before or day of the procedure needs modifier 57. If an autograft harvest is performed from a separate anatomic site, that harvest may be separately reportable — document the donor site explicitly in the operative note.
This procedure is almost always performed in a hospital or ASC setting given its complexity. Site-of-service payment differentials are significant; see the HOPD vs. ASC payment comparison on this page. Payers including Medicaid managed care plans frequently require prior authorization for nasomaxillary fracture repairs with grafting — confirm requirements before scheduling.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 17.08 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.81 |
| Malpractice RVU | 2.49 |
| Total RVU | 28.38 |
| Medicare national rate | $947.92 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $947.92 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,833.49 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21348 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Graft not documented — payer downcodes to a non-graft nasomaxillary repair code when grafting is not explicitly confirmed in the operative note
- Missing pre-op imaging or inadequate documentation of bone loss justifying graft use, triggering medical necessity denial
- Prior authorization not obtained for elective or semi-elective repair in managed care or Medicaid plans
- Separate graft harvest code billed without documentation of a distinct donor site procedure
- Global period violation — post-op E/M billed within 90 days without modifier 24 for an unrelated condition
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What distinguishes 21348 from other nasomaxillary fracture codes?
02Can I separately bill for the autograft harvest?
03Does the 90-day global period affect how I bill for hardware removal if needed later?
04Is modifier 22 appropriate if the reconstruction was significantly more complex than typical?
05Do I need prior authorization for 21348?
06How should I handle billing when a plastic or ENT surgeon co-operates with the orthopedic or craniofacial surgeon?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-faq-library
- 04aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/education/about-aaos-products/coding-resources/
- 05aoassn.orghttps://www.aoassn.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CodingTTP.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
The Mira AI Scribe captures the fracture pattern, confirmation of open exposure, graft type and donor site, fixation hardware details, and any concurrent procedures from dictation — structured into the operative note fields auditors check first. That prevents the most common downcoding scenario: a graft that was placed but never explicitly named in the note, which causes payers to reprocess the claim under a lower-value non-graft repair code.
See how Mira captures CPT 21348 documentation