Complete subperiosteal implant reconstruction of the mandible or maxilla, placing a custom implant on top of the jawbone beneath the periosteum to restore jaw structure and function.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $767.89
- Total RVUs
- 22.99
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Operative note must specify complete (not partial) coverage of the mandible or maxilla and confirm subperiosteal implant placement beneath the periosteum
- Pre-operative imaging (CT or CBCT) demonstrating extent of bone loss or deformity and confirming implant design rationale
- ICD-10 diagnosis reflecting the underlying etiology — atrophy, post-resection defect, trauma, or congenital anomaly — with clinical narrative support
- Implant specifications documented: material, manufacturer, custom vs. stock, and confirmation of complete jaw coverage
- Prior authorization documentation and payer-required clinical justification where applicable (Humana, HealthFirst, and regional plans commonly require this)
- Evidence that less-invasive alternatives (conventional dentures, partial bone grafting) were considered or attempted and deemed insufficient
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21246 covers complete reconstruction of the mandible or maxilla using a subperiosteal implant — a custom framework seated directly on the bone surface, under the periosteum, spanning the entire jaw rather than a partial segment. This distinguishes it from 21245, which covers only a partial subperiosteal reconstruction. The procedure addresses severe jawbone atrophy, post-resection defects, trauma sequelae, or congenital deformity where the remaining bone cannot support conventional implants or dentures without structural augmentation.
The implant is typically fabricated from titanium or a biocompatible alloy and custom-fitted to the patient's residual ridge. The surgeon elevates the periosteum, seats the framework on the bone, and secures it before closure. The 90-day global period covers all routine post-operative management through day 90, including follow-up visits for wound checks and implant evaluation. Any unrelated E/M service during the global window requires modifier 24; a new problem requiring a separate decision for surgery needs modifier 25 if billed on the surgical date.
Primary indication coding must reflect the underlying pathology — atrophy, tumor resection defect, trauma, or congenital anomaly — not simply 'jaw reconstruction.' Payer medical necessity review is aggressive for this code; Humana, HealthFirst, and several regional plans have explicit orthognathic and reconstructive surgery policies that require prior authorization and documented failure of less-invasive alternatives.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 12.6 |
| Practice expense RVU | 8.56 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.83 |
| Total RVU | 22.99 |
| Medicare national rate | $767.89 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $767.89 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $5,000.74 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21246 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Missing or insufficient prior authorization — multiple major payers list this procedure under orthognathic or reconstructive surgery policies requiring pre-approval
- Diagnosis coded as cosmetic or unspecified rather than a covered reconstructive indication such as tumor resection sequela, trauma, or documented severe atrophy
- Billing 21246 when only a partial segment was reconstructed — partial procedures map to 21245 and auditors will flag the mismatch against the operative note
- Global period billing conflict — routine post-op visits billed without modifier 24 or 25 during the 90-day window trigger automatic denials
- Incomplete operative documentation lacking explicit confirmation of 'complete' jaw coverage, causing medical necessity reviewers to downcode to 21245
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01What is the difference between CPT 21245 and 21246?
02Does CPT 21246 require prior authorization?
03What is the global period for 21246 and what does it include?
04Can 21246 be billed with a bone grafting code on the same day?
05Which ICD-10 codes typically support medical necessity for 21246?
06Is co-surgeon billing (modifier 62) appropriate for 21246?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-faq-library
- 03emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 04findacode.comhttps://www.findacode.com/cpt/21246-cpt-code.html
- 05genhealth.aihttps://genhealth.ai/code/cpt4/21246-reconstruction-of-mandible-or-maxilla-subperiosteal-implant-complete
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/education/about-aaos-products/coding-resources/
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the surgeon's dictation of implant type, material, and whether coverage was complete versus partial, the specific jaw (mandible vs. maxilla), periosteal elevation technique, and the underlying clinical indication driving reconstruction. That detail prevents the two most common audit flags: downcoding to 21245 for incomplete documentation of full jaw coverage, and denial for unspecified or cosmetic diagnosis coding.
See how Mira captures CPT 21246 documentation