Reconstruction of the mandibular rami using a horizontal, vertical, C, or L osteotomy, with bone graft harvested from the patient (graft procurement included).
Verified May 8, 2026 · 6 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,279.59
- Total RVUs
- 38.31
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 6 cited references ↓
- Specify osteotomy configuration by name: horizontal, vertical, C, or L — vague references to 'mandibular osteotomy' invite downcoding
- Document the indication for reconstruction: trauma sequelae, congenital deformity, or functional impairment with supporting clinical findings
- Confirm autograft harvest site (e.g., iliac crest, mandibular symphysis) and describe graft procurement in the operative note — procurement is bundled, but must be documented
- Record skeletal maturity status for elective orthognathic cases; most payers require it for medical necessity determination
- Document failure or inadequacy of non-surgical management when required by payer prior authorization criteria
- Note any unusual anatomic complexity, prior surgical scarring, or complicating factors if modifier 22 is appended
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 6 cited references ↓
CPT 21194 covers surgical reconstruction of the mandibular rami — the vertical portions of the lower jaw — via osteotomy (horizontal, vertical, C, or L configuration) with autogenous bone graft. Graft harvesting is bundled into the code; do not separately report procurement. The procedure is typically performed to correct skeletal deformities resulting from trauma, congenital malformation, or prior failed reconstruction. It pairs with 21193 (same osteotomy, no graft) as its without-graft counterpart.
This is a 90-day global procedure. That window covers the day-before visit, the surgery, and all routine post-op management through day 90. E/M visits for new or unrelated problems during that period require modifier 24. If the decision for surgery is made at the same encounter as the pre-op evaluation, append modifier 57 to the E/M code — required for any major (90-day global) procedure.
Billing is dominated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Payer medical necessity criteria vary: most commercial plans follow AAOMS orthognathic surgery criteria, requiring documented functional impairment, failure of non-surgical management, and skeletal maturity. Verify prior authorization requirements before scheduling — this is a high-dollar elective reconstruction that many payers flag for pre-service review.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 21.27 |
| Practice expense RVU | 13.97 |
| Malpractice RVU | 3.07 |
| Total RVU | 38.31 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,279.59 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,279.59 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,833.49 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21194 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Cosmetic exclusion: payer denies as not medically necessary when documentation fails to establish functional impairment (malocclusion, airway compromise, pain)
- Missing or denied prior authorization — high-dollar orthognathic procedures are routinely subject to pre-service review by commercial payers
- Separate billing of bone graft procurement alongside 21194 — harvesting is included in the code descriptor and will be bundled or denied
- ICD-10 mismatch: diagnosis code reflects cosmetic or aesthetic concern rather than functional skeletal pathology
- Skeletal immaturity for elective cases — some payers deny when documentation does not confirm growth completion
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 6 cited references ↓
01Is bone graft harvesting separately billable with 21194?
02What is the difference between 21193 and 21194?
03Does 21194 require prior authorization?
04How is an E/M visit billed on the day before surgery for a 21194 case?
05Can 21194 be billed with modifier 62 when two surgeons are involved?
06What ICD-10 codes support medical necessity for 21194?
07If a staged second-phase mandibular procedure is planned after 21194, which modifier applies?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/21194
- 03louisianahealthconnect.comhttps://www.louisianahealthconnect.com/content/dam/centene/louisiana-health-connect/policies/clinical-policies/LA.CP.MP.202%20Orthognathic%20Surgery%2011.23.pdf
- 04emedny.orghttps://www.emedny.org/providermanuals/physician/pdfs/physician%20procedure%20codes%20sect5.pdf
- 05cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/04-chapter4-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2026-final.pdf
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/coding-and-reimbursement/resident-guide/resident-guide_modifiers.pdf
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the osteotomy configuration (horizontal, vertical, C, or L), the graft harvest site and technique, the clinical indication with functional impairment details, and any complicating anatomic factors from dictation. This prevents the two most common audit flags: an operative note that names only 'mandibular osteotomy' without specifying geometry, and a diagnosis that reads as cosmetic rather than functional — both of which trigger medical necessity denials.
See how Mira captures CPT 21194 documentation