Midface reconstruction via LeFort II osteotomy, movement in any direction, with bone grafting including autograft harvest
Verified May 8, 2026 · 7 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $1,553.81
- Total RVUs
- 46.52
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- Other
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 7 cited references ↓
- Operative note must identify the specific osteotomy level as LeFort II, not generic 'midface osteotomy'
- Document the direction of segment movement (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, or combination)
- Record bone graft source — autograft site, quantity harvested, and method of fixation at recipient site
- If freeze-dried or synthetic graft is used instead of autograft, document explicitly so modifier 52 is supported
- Identify each surgeon's distinct operative role if co-surgeon (modifier 62) billing is used
- Indications and diagnosis supporting medical necessity — e.g., traumatic midface deformity, congenital anomaly, or post-oncologic reconstruction
- Pre- and post-operative imaging supporting the planned skeletal movement and graft need
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 7 cited references ↓
CPT 21151 covers LeFort II midface reconstruction where the midface segment is mobilized in any direction and bone grafts are required to stabilize the repositioned skeletal unit. The code includes autograft harvest — no separate bone graft code is needed when autogenous bone is taken as part of this procedure. LeFort II osteotomy cuts involve the nasal bones and medial orbital walls, distinguishing it from the lower-level LeFort I family (21145–21147) and the more extensive LeFort III codes (21154–21155).
This is a 90-day global procedure. All routine post-op management through day 90 is included in the surgical payment. Interdental fixation or splint placement performed as a component of the reconstruction does not warrant a separate code unless it is a distinct, separately documented service unrelated to the osteotomy. When two surgeons operate together — common in craniofacial cases — co-surgeon billing with modifier 62 requires each surgeon to document their distinct, non-overlapping roles in the operative note.
If freeze-dried or synthetic (non-autogenous) bone material is substituted and no surgical harvest is performed, the bone graft component described by the code is not fully executed. In that scenario, modifier 52 is appropriate to signal reduced service. Confirm this approach with the payer before submission, as commercial carriers vary on how they handle modifier 52 reductions for this code family.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 28.29 |
| Practice expense RVU | 14.1 |
| Malpractice RVU | 4.13 |
| Total RVU | 46.52 |
| Medicare national rate | $1,553.81 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $1,553.81 |
HOPD (APC 5165) Hospital outpatient department | $6,048.05 |
ASC (PI J8) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $3,833.49 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 21151 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Operative note uses non-specific language like 'midface osteotomy' without confirming LeFort II level, triggering downcoding to a less complex code
- Bone graft harvest not documented, causing payer to question whether the graft component of the code was actually performed
- Co-surgeon claims denied when each surgeon's operative note does not independently describe distinct, non-overlapping surgical roles
- Medical necessity denial when diagnosis codes reflect cosmetic indication rather than reconstructive or congenital basis
- Modifier 52 omitted on claims where synthetic bone substitute was used and no autograft harvest occurred, flagged on audit
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 7 cited references ↓
01Does 21151 include the bone graft harvest, or do I bill a separate graft code?
02When is modifier 52 appropriate for 21151?
03Can two surgeons each bill 21151 with modifier 62 for the same case?
04What distinguishes 21151 from 21150 and 21154?
05Is 21151 on the inpatient-only list?
06What global period applies to 21151?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02aaoms.orghttps://aaoms.org/publications/coding-and-billing-papers/coding-for-orthognathic-surgery-and-or-obstructive-sleep-apnea/
- 03cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r13573cp.pdf
- 04cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/r11150cp.pdf
- 05aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/advocacy/issues/2021-opps-pr-tables.pdf
- 06aaos.orghttps://www.aaos.org/globalassets/advocacy/issues/opps-final-rule-tables.pdf
- 07cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/national-correct-coding-initiative-ncci-edits/medicare-ncci-faq-library
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the LeFort II osteotomy level, direction of midface movement, bone graft source and harvest site, method of fixation, and each surgeon's distinct operative contribution from dictation. This prevents the most common audit flag for 21151 — an operative note that confirms a midface reconstruction occurred but fails to document the specific osteotomy level or graft harvest, which reviewers use to downcode or deny the claim.
See how Mira captures CPT 21151 documentation