Surgical removal of a deeply embedded fixation implant — such as a buried screw, plate, rod, nail, wire, or metal band — requiring a deep incision typically below the muscle layer.
Verified May 8, 2026 · 5 sources ↓
- Medicare
- $631.95
- Total RVUs
- 18.92
- Global, days
- 90
- Region
- General
Documentation requirements
What must appear in the operative or office note to support the claim.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in 5 cited references ↓
- Confirm the implant required a deep incision below the muscle layer — document depth of dissection explicitly
- Identify the specific device removed (e.g., 4.5mm cortical screw, DCP plate, IM nail) and the anatomic site
- Document the number of incisions made and confirm they all served a single fracture site or anatomic region
- State that hardware removal was not an integral component of any simultaneously performed primary procedure
- Record the original implantation date or reference the prior surgical note to establish the device history
- Layered closure technique should be documented to support the depth classification as 'deep'
Applicable modifiers
Modifiers commonly billed with this code.
Source · AMA CPT modifier descriptors · CMS NCCI Policy Manual
What this code covers
Source · Editorial summary grounded in 5 cited references ↓
CPT 20680 covers the open surgical removal of a deep internal fixation device previously placed to stabilize a fracture or joint. 'Deep' means the surgeon must incise below the muscle layer to access and extract the hardware — that's the clinical threshold that separates 20680 from 20670, which covers superficial removals. Devices that qualify include buried screws, plates, intramedullary rods, nails, metal bands, and wires requiring deep dissection.
One unit of 20680 covers all hardware removed from a single anatomic site, even if multiple stab incisions were necessary. CMS is explicit: one unit = all screws, rods, and plates removed from one anatomic area, whether through one incision or several. An IM rod with locking screws at both ends is still one unit. A second unit is only reportable when hardware is removed from a distinct second anatomic site.
20680 carries a 90-day global period. If hardware removal is an integral step within a larger procedure — revision ORIF for nonunion, for example — it's not separately billable. The NCCI manual is unambiguous: 20680 cannot be stacked on top of a procedure it's necessary to complete.
RVU & reimbursement
Component RVUs and Medicare national rate. Actual payment varies by GPCI locality.
Source · CMS Physician Fee Schedule, RVU26A · January 2026
| Work RVU | 5.81 |
| Practice expense RVU | 12.05 |
| Malpractice RVU | 1.06 |
| Total RVU | 18.92 |
| Medicare national rate | $631.95 |
| Global period | 90 days |
Payment by site of service
Medicare pays different rates by setting. HOPD typically pays substantially more than ASC for the same procedure.
Source · CMS OPPS Addendum B·ASC HCPCS payment rates·2026
| Setting | Medicare rate (national) |
|---|---|
Office (PFS non-facility) Procedure performed in physician's office | $631.95 |
HOPD (APC 5073) Hospital outpatient department | $2,967.63 |
ASC (PI A2) Ambulatory surgical center (freestanding) | $1,248.36 |
Common denial reasons
The recurring reasons claims for CPT 20680 get rejected.
Source · Editorial brief grounded in CMS NCCI edits, AAOS coding appeals, and cited references ↓
- Bundled into a same-session primary procedure (e.g., revision ORIF, arthroplasty) where removal is considered integral
- Billed as multiple units for a single anatomic site — CMS allows one unit per site regardless of incision count
- Coded as 20680 when operative note describes only a superficial incision — payer downcodes to 20670
- No documentation distinguishing the removal from the global period of the original fixation surgery
- Missing implant identification — audit flags when operative note says 'hardware removed' without specifying device type and site
Frequently asked questions
Source · Generated from the editorial pipeline, verified against 5 cited references ↓
01What makes a removal 'deep' enough for 20680 vs. 20670?
02Can I bill 20680 multiple times when an IM rod requires locking-screw incisions at both ends?
03If hardware removal is performed at two separate anatomic sites in the same session, can I bill two units?
04Can 20680 be billed during the global period of the original fracture repair?
05What modifier applies if hardware removal is attempted but the surgeon cannot complete it?
06Is 20680 separately reportable when performed as part of a same-session arthroplasty or revision ORIF?
Sources & references
Editorial content was developed using the following public sources. Last verified May 8, 2026.
- 01CMS Physician Fee Schedule 2026
- 02cms.govhttps://www.cms.gov/files/document/2025nccimedicarepolicymanualcompletepdf.pdf
- 03aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/blog/27187-superficial-or-deep-20680-vs-20670/
- 04kzanow.comhttps://www.kzanow.com/coding-coaches/failed-hardware-removal
- 05aapc.comhttps://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes/20680
Mira AI Scribe
Mira's AI scribe captures the implant type and name, the anatomic site, incision depth relative to the muscle layer, and whether hardware removal was the primary purpose of the encounter or subordinate to another procedure. This prevents the two most common 20680 denials: depth miscoding (20680 vs. 20670) and improper bundling with a simultaneously performed revision procedure. The scribe also flags when multiple incisions serve a single fracture site, prompting the coder to bill one unit rather than multiple.
See how Mira captures CPT 20680 documentation